green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.4 score
“both parties assume the phrase 'impede or obstruct the administration of justice' includes perjury, and the commentary to 3c1.1 is explicit in so providing.”
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Michael Eugene Jones, A/K/A Big Mike
both parties assume the phrase 'impede or obstruct the administration of justice' includes perjury, and the commentary to 3c1.1 is explicit in so providing.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert Andrews, III
See Dunnigan, 507 U.S. at 95 , 118 S.Ct. 1111 (treating the basis for obstruction of justice as an issue of fact left to the sentencing judge).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tawil
See United States v. Dunnigan, 507 U.S. 87, 94-95 , 118 S.Ct. 1111 , 1116-17, 122 L.Ed.2d 445 (1993); United States v. Ancheta, 38 F.3d 1114, 1118 (9th Cir.1994); United States v. Arias-Villanueva, 998 F.2d 1491, 1513 (9th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Ecklin
The sentencing court must “specifically identify the perjurious statements and make a finding either as to *366 each element of perjury or that encompasses all of the factual predicates for a finding of perjury.” United States v. Akinkoye, 185 F.3d 192, 205 (4th Cir.1999) (citation and quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. Dunnigan, 507 U.S. 87, 95 , 118 S.Ct. 1111 , 122 L.Ed.2d 445 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Craig
v.
Martin
v.
Martin
No. 97-6993.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari before judgment denied.