green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
12.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2005 ·
…bjecause texas prisoners have no protected liberty interest in parole they cannot mount a challenge against any state parole review procedure on procedural (or substantive) due process grounds.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Parker v. Sirmons
bjecause texas prisoners have no protected liberty interest in parole they cannot mount a challenge against any state parole review procedure on procedural (or substantive) due process grounds.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wildermuth v. Furlong
bjecause texas prisoners have no protected liberty interest in parole they cannot mount a challenge against any state parole review procedure on procedural (or substantive) due process grounds.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wildermuth v. Furlong
ecause texas prisoners have no protected liberty interest in parole they cannot mount a challenge against any state parole review procedure on procedural (or substantive) due process grounds.
cited
Cited "see"
Carrio v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 310 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 995 , 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 400 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Enriquez v. Stringfellow
See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 308 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 995 , 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 400 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
McCoy v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF LABORERS'INTERN.
See Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1475 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 996 , 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 401 (1997); Wald v. Southwestern Bell Corp. Customcare Med.
cited
Cited "see"
McCoy v. Board of Trustees of the Laborers' International Union, Local No. 222 Pension Plan
See Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1475 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 996 , 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 401 (1997); Wald v. Southwestern Bell Corp. Customcare Med.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re GC
See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 306 (5th Cir.) (explaining that when state action does not "`appear to classify or distinguish between two or more relevant persons or groups,... the actioneven if irrationaldoes not deny them equal protection of the laws'.... because such state actions are not subject to Equal Protection scrutiny") (citations omitted), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 995 , 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 400 (1997); Sanders, 36 S.W.3d at 225 (stating that party asserting equal protection claim must first establish that he was treated differently than similarly-situated parties).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Interest of G.C.
See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 306 (5th Cir.) (explaining that when state action does not “ ‘appear to classify or distinguish between two or more relevant persons or groups, ... the action — even if irrational — does not deny them equal protection of the laws’ .... because such state actions are not subject to Equal Protection scrutiny”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 995 , 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 400 (1997); Sanders, 36 S.W.3d at 225 (stating that party asserting equal protection claim must first establish that he was treated differently than similarly-s…
cited
Cited "see"
Schmier v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
See Johnson v. Knowles, 113 F.3d 1114, 1117 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 996 , 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 401 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Clay v. Jackson
See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299 , 310 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 559 (1997); Woods v. Smith, 60 F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir. 1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Martin v. Perez
See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299 , 310 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 559 (1997); Whittington v. Lynaugh, 842 F.2d 818, 819 (5th Cir. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Diaz v. State
See Van Poyck v. State, 694 So.2d 686, 697 (Fla.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 995 , 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 400 (1997); Cole v. State, 700 So.2d 33, 36 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), review denied, 705 So.2d 569 (Fla.1998).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Silicon Graphics Inc. Securities Litigation. Edmund J. Janas v. Edward R. McCracken Michael Ramsay Robert K. Burgess Thomas J. Oswald Teruyasu Sekimoto Forest Baskett Stephen Goggiano William M. Kelly Lucille Shapiro Silicon Graphics, Inc., Deanna Brody Andrea S. Donald Israel Buck Ruth Buck Denise Struthers Thomas G. Di Cicco Ira Steven B. Ewall Rosalyn Golaine Jerry Krim Mary Anne Beke Herman Grossman Samuel J. Reiner Dennis Lucas v. Edward R. McCracken Michael Ramsay Robert K. Burgess Thomas J. Oswald Teruyasu Sekimoto Forest Baskett Stephen Goggiano William M. Kelly Lucille Shapiro Silicon Graphics, Inc.
See Johnson v. Knowles, 113 F.3d 1114 , 1117 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 118 S. Ct. 559 , 139 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Janas v. McCracken
See Johnson v. Knowles, 113 F.3d 1114 , 1117 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 401 (1997). .
cited
Cited "see"
Boudreaux v. Reed
See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 310 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 559 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Teffeteller v. Dugger
See Van Poyck v. State, 694 So.2d 686 , 698-99 n. 6 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 400 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin Lindstedt v. Missouri Libertarian Party Rebecca M. Cook James Givens State of Missouri
See Johnson v. Knowles, 113 F.3d 1114, 1120 (9th Cir.) (county Republican Central Committee was not government actor because nothing tied state to particular decision to expel two members because of their sexual orientation), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 401 (1997); Banchy v. Republican Party, 898 F.2d 1192, 1195 (6th Cir.1990) (party did not act under color of state law in precluding members from voting in internal election for ward chairman).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin Lindstedt v. MO Libertarian
See Johnson v. Knowles, 113 F.3d 1114 , 1120 (9th Cir.) (county Republican Central Committee was not government actor because nothing tied state to particular decision to expel two members because of their sexual orientation), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 559 (1997); Banchy v. Republican Party, 898 F.2d 1192, 1195 (6th Cir. 1990) (party did not act under color of state law in precluding members from voting in internal election for ward chairman).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lori Blitz, AKA Jackie Cross, United States of America v. Jerry Pierre Sainte Marie, United States of America v. Kristen Leon Hall, AKA Leon Hall, United States of America v. Jacob Giffin, United States of America v. Norman Hefferan, AKA Bill Edwards AKA Norm Craig, United States of America v. Harold Larsen
See Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1481 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 401 (1997); Hubbard, 96 F.3d at 1227-28 ; Lothian, 976 F.2d at 1262 . 42 Therefore, each completed call was a separate, completed fraud offense.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Blitz
See Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1481 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 401 (1997); Hubbard, 96 F.3d at 1227-28 ; Lothian, 976 F.2d at 1262 .
cited
Cited "see"
Greater Dallas Home Care Alliance v. United States
See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 306-07 (5th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 400 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bass v. Singletary
See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299 , 311 n. 15 (5th Cir.) (“[W]hile the assistance of other prisoners may be .one way in which a particular prisoner’s right of constitutional access to the courts is vindicated, such is not in and of itself a constitutional right.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 400 (1997); Tighe v. Wall, 100 F.3d 41, 42-43 (5th Cir.1996); Gibbs v. Hopkins, 10 F.3d 373, 378 (6th Cir.1993); Williams v. Nix, 1 F.3d 712, 716 (8th Cir.1993); Smith v. Maschner, 899 F.2d 940, 950 (10th Cir.1990); Gassler v. Rayl, 862 F.2d 706, 707-08 (8th Cir.1988);…
discussed
Cited "see"
Carlos Tamayo, Jr. v. U.S. Department of Labor Robert Reich
See Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1473-74 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 401 (1997); Marx v. Loral Corp., 87 F.3d 1049, 1055-56 (9th Cir.1996) 2 We reject Tamayo's remaining contentions because they lack merit
discussed
Cited "see"
Terry v. Oregon Dept. of Transp.
See Johnson v. Knowles, 113 F.3d 1114, 1118-20 (9th Cir.1997) (describing the Supreme Court's four tests to determine when private party acts under color of state law), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 401 (1997); Collins v. Womancare, 878 F.2d 1145, 1147-56 (9th Cir.1989) (concluding that private party who made citizen's arrest did not act under color of state law). 5 AFFIRMED. ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
cited
Cited "see"
Edith Rogers Margaret Edwards v. County of Riverside Lawrence Townsend Jerry Cate Dolores Dee Dominguez
See Johnson v. Knowles, 113 F.3d 1114, 1117 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 401 (1997); see also In re Stac Elecs.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Sales
See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 310 (5th Cir.) (holding that the relevant showing in retaliation cases "must be more than the prisoner's personal belief that he is the victim of retaliation") (further quotation omitted), cert. denied, 118 S.Ct. 559 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Brinson v. McKeeman
See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299 , 310-13 & 316 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied,— U.S-, 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 400 (1997). 74 .
cited
Cited "see"
RONALD LEE BARLOW v. VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, Chairman, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Parole Division
See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 308 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 559 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Woods v. Smith, 60 F.3d 1161, 1164 (5th Cir. 1995); see Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 310 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 559 (1997
Woods v. Smith, 60 F.3d 1161, 1164 (5th Cir. 1995); see Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 310 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 559 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
VICTOR L. HALL v. L. AUDAS; D. PRICE; J.F. LUMA; KENT RAMSEY
See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 310 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S.Ct. 559 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estes v. State
Appellant argues that we should apply a higher review of strict scrutiny with respect to his equal protection claim because section ■22.011(f) "impinges on his fundamental right to marry.” See Nat’l Rifle Ass'n of Am., Inc. v. McCraw, 719 F.3d 338, 350 (5th Cir.2013) (stating that courts should strictly scrutinize a legislative classification that "impermissibly interferes with the exercise of a fundamental right”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 1365 , 188 L.Ed.2d‘297 (2014); see also Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 316 (5th Cir.) (explaining that when government action o…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Price v. Jefferson County
See Police Ass’n of New Orleans v. City of New Orleans, 100 F.3d 1159, 1170 (5th Cir.1996); see also Priester, 354 F.3d at 424 . “ ‘A violation of the equal protection clause occurs only when, inter alia, the governmental action in question classifies between two or more relevant persons or groups.’ ” Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 309 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 995 , 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 400 (1997) (quoting Vera v. Tue, 73 F.3d 604, 609-10 (5th Cir.1996)); see Edwards v. Johnson, 209 F.3d 772, 780 (5th Cir.2000); Mayabb, 168 F.3d at 870 ; accord Woodard v. Andrus…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Price v. Jefferson County
See Police Ass'n of New Orleans v. City of New Orleans, 100 F.3d 1159, 1170 (5th Cir.1996); see also Priester, 354 F.3d at 424 . "`A violation of the equal protection clause occurs only when, inter alia, the governmental action in question classifies between two or more relevant persons or groups.'" Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 309 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 995 , 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 400 (1997) (quoting Vera v. Tue, 73 F.3d 604, 609-10 (5th Cir.1996)); see Edwards v. Johnson, 209 F.3d 772, 780 (5th Cir.2000); Mayabb, 168 F.3d at 870 ; accord Woodard v. Andrus, 419 F.3d 3…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Webber v. Bureau of Prisons
See Woods v. Smith, 60 F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1084 , 116 S.Ct. 800 , 133 L.Ed.2d 747 (1996); see also Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 310 (5th Cir.)(prisoner must allege more than mere subjective beliefs that a defendant retaliated against him), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 995 , 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 400 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stewart v. Commonwealth
Unlike the revocation decision, there is no set of facts which if shown, mandate a decision favorable to the individual. *792 Belcher, supra, 917 S.W.2d at 587 quoting Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 9-10 , 99 S.Ct. 2100, 2105 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979); see also Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299 (5th Cir.1997), cert. den., 522 U.S. 995 , 118 S.Ct. 559 , 139 L.Ed.2d 400 (1997), which held in part that because there was no protected liberty or property interest in parole, prisoners cannot mount a challenge against any state parole review procedure on …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Wayne L. Yashinsky
Disqualification under both sections 144 and 455 must be predicated “upon extrajudicial conduct rather than on judicial conduct,” United States v. Story, 716 F.2d 1088, 1091 (6th Cir.1983) (quoting City of Cleveland v. Krupansky, 619 F.2d 576, 578 (6th Cir.1980)), and upon “a personal bias ‘as distinguished from a judicial one,’ arising ‘out of the judge’s background and association’ and not from the ‘judge’s view of the law.’ ” Id. at 1090 (quoting Oliver v. Michigan State Bd. of Educ., 508 F.2d 178, 180 (6th Cir.1974)); see also Green v. Nevers, 111 F.3d 1295, 1303-04…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ritter et ux.
v.
Ross, Rock County Treasurer
v.
Ross, Rock County Treasurer
No. 97-435.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (3)
Gt.App.Wis. Certiorari denied.