Harbert/Lummus Agrifuels Projects v. United States, 119 S. Ct. 1111 (1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Harbert/Lummus Agrifuels Projects v. United States, 119 S. Ct. 1111 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “The fact that [the plaintiff] may have believed that the CO [contracting officer] had authority is irrelevant; [the plaintiff] must prove that the CO had actual authority.”
28 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Doe v. United States (uscfc, 2003-11-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Doe v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2003 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the fact that may have believed that the co had authority is irrelevant; must prove that the co had actual authority.
discussed Cited "see" Allen v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harbert/Lummus Agrifuels Projects v. United States, 142 F.3d 1429, 1432 (Fed.Cir.), reh’q denied and en banc suggestion declined (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied 525 U.S. 1177 , 119 S.Ct. 1111 , 143 L.Ed.2d 107 (1999); see also Trauma Serv.
discussed Cited "see" Gemini Electronics, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harbert/Lummus Agrifuels Projects v. United States, 142 F.3d 1429, 1432 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied, en banc suggestion declined (1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1177 , 119 S.Ct. 1111 , 143 L.Ed.2d 107 (1999) (citations omitted); see also Trauma Serv.
cited Cited "see" Hawkins & Powers Aviation, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harbert/Lummus Agrifuels Projects v. United States, 142 F.3d 1429, 1434 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1177 , 119 S.Ct. 1111 , 143 L.Ed.2d 107 (1999); Trauma Serv.
cited Cited "see" United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-Appellee
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Shotts, 145 F.3d 1289, 1293 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 1111 , 143 L.Ed.2d 108 (1999).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Steele
11th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Shotts, 145 F.3d 1289 , 1293 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 1111 , 143 L.Ed.2d 108 (1999).
cited Cited "see" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM O. STEELE
unknown court · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Shotts, 145 F.3d 1289, 1293 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 119 S. Ct. 1111 (1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Compliance Solutions Occupational Trainers, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Grp. v. United States, 104 F.3d 1321, 1325 (Fed.Cir.1997); see also Harbert/Lummus Agrifuels Projects v. United States, 142 F.3d 1429, 1434 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1177 , 119 S.Ct. 1111 , 143 L.Ed.2d 107 (1999); City of El Centro v. United States, 922 F.2d 816, 820 (Fed.Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1230 , 111 S.Ct. 2851 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1991).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Ruttenburg v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Harbert/Lummus Agrifuels Projects v. United States, 142 F.3d 1429, 1433 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1177 , 119 S.Ct. 1111 , 143 L.Ed.2d 107 (1999); American Gen.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bailey v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Beebe, 180 U.S. 343, 354 , 21 S.Ct. 371 , 45 L.Ed. 563 (1901); see also Harbert/Lummus Agrifuels Projects v. United States, 142 F.3d at 1433 (“Agreements made by government agents without authority to bind the government may be subsequently ratified by those with authority if the ratifying officials have actual or constructive knowledge of the unauthorized acts.”) (citing United States v. Beebe, 180 U.S. at 354 , 21 S.Ct. 371 ), reh’g denied (1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1177 , 119 S.Ct. 1111 , 143 L.Ed.2d 107 (1999); Henke v. United States, 43 Fed.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gulf States Steel, Inc.
N.D. Ala. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
“By failing to challenge its NPDES permit under state law at a time when its purported legal deficiency should have been as apparent to the defendant as it is now, the defendant is precluded from doing so in this action.” Connecticut Fund for the Environment v. Job Plating Co., Inc., 623 F.Supp. 207, 216 (D.Conn.1985); see also Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc., 956 F.Supp. 588 , 597-98 (D.S.C.1997) (discussing the purposes and legislative history behind precluding collateral attacks on NPDES permits in enforcement proceedings), vacated on other groun…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HARBERT/LUMMUS AGRIFUELS PROJECTS
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 98-697.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1999.
119 S. Ct. 1111
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 61%
Citer courts: Federal Claims (1)

No opinion found. Click here to view source material.