red
Negative treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. New Mexico Department of Health
See Coolbaugh v. State of La., 136 F.3d 430, 435-37 (5th Cir.) (detailing the numerous studies upon which Congress relied in concluding that disability discrimination is a pervasive and severe problem needing a comprehensive solution), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 819 , 119 S.Ct. 58 , 142 L.Ed.2d 45 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Briggs v. Walker
This standard is “objectively appropriate” and is not discriminatory. 162 F.3d at 50 ; see Coolbaugh v. State of La., 136 F.3d 430, 439 (5th Cir.) (A “decision motivated by a desire to protect the public on the state’s highways” is not disability discrimination.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 819 , 119 S.Ct. 58 , 142 L.Ed.2d 45 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Muller v. Costello
Rev. 393 , 393-94 & nn. 1-4 (1991) (reciting deliberative process as including "eleven public hearings [in] the House of Representatives . . . and three by the Senate . . . [and] lengthy floor debates in the Senate and in the House of Representatives" and collecting citations thereto); see alsoCoolbaugh v. Louisiana, 136 F.3d 430 , 436-37 & n.4 (5th Cir.) (recounting extensive deliberative and fact gathering process), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 58 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
C. B. Alsbrook v. AR Commission on Law
Accord Coolbaugh v. Louisiana, 136 F.3d 430, 433 (5th Cir.) (finding that Congress’s intent to abrogate state immunity is “patently clear” in the ADA), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 58 , 142 L.Ed.2d 45 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alsbrook v. City Of Maumelle
Accord Coolbaugh v. Louisiana, 136 F.3d 430, 433 (5th Cir.) (finding that Congress's intent to abrogate state immunity is "patently clear" in the ADA), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 58 (1998). 21 Second, we determine whether Congress has acted pursuant to a valid exercise of power.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Frederick L. v. Department of Public Welfare
See, e.g., Coolbaugh v. Louisiana, 136 F.3d 430 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 819 , 119 S.Ct. 58 , 142 L.Ed.2d 45 (1998); Clark, 123 F.3d at 1269 . 18 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neiberger v. Hawkins
See, e.g., Shaboon v. Duncan, 252 F.3d 722 (5th Cir.2001) (following Coolbaugh v. State of Louisiana, 136 F.3d 430, 438 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 819 , 119 S.Ct. 58 , 142 L.Ed.2d 45 in hold *1122 ing that states enjoy no Eleventh Amendment immunity from Title II); Wroncy v. Oregon Dept. of Transp., 2001 WL 474550 *1 (9th Cir. May 4, 2001) (holding the states do not have Eleventh Amendment immunity from Title II claims, and that Garrett did not require a reconsideration of that proposition); Popovich v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Div., 227 F.3d 627 (6…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Muller v. Costello
L.Rev. 393, 393-94 & nn. 1-4 (1991) (reciting deliberative process as including “eleven public hearings [in] the House of Representatives ... and three by the Senate ... [and] lengthy floor debates in the Senate and in the House of Representatives” and collecting citations thereto); see also Coolbaugh v. Louisiana, 136 F.3d 430 , 436-37 & n. 4 (5th Cir.) (recounting extensive deliberative and fact gathering process), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 58 , 142 L.Ed.2d 45 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Taylor
v.
Ham, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Chief of Police, Ponca City Police Department
v.
Ham, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Chief of Police, Ponca City Police Department
No. 97-1939.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1998.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.