green
Positive treatment
9.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Noel v. Hall
(2×)
See United States v. Smith, 155 F.3d 1051 , 1057 n. 11 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Collins
See United States v. Miller, 148 F.3d 207, 213 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied 525 U.S. 1072 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 665 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Santiago
See United States v. Polanco, 145 F.3d 536 , 540 n. 2 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 803 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999); see also United States v. Malpeso, 115 F.3d 155 , 159 n. 1, 164 (2d Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Greer
See United States v. Miller, 148 F.3d 207, 211 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1072 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 665 (1999). 86 We have not previously had occasion to interpret the MDLEA's jurisdictional provisions.
cited
Cited "see"
PEOPLE OF STATE OF NY EX REL. SPITZER v. Kraeger
See United States v. Weslin, 156 F.3d 292, 298 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 665 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Blair G. McLachlan v. James Bell Michael George Charles Smith, Opinion
See United States v. Smith, 155 F.3d 1051 , 1063 n. 18 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S. Cl. 804, 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Weslin
See United States v. Weslin, 964 F.Supp. 83 (W.D.N.Y.1997), aff'd, 156 F.3d 292 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 665 (1999). *549 One of the plaintiffs in the Spitzer case is Buffalo GYN Womenservices, Inc., a clinic at which reproductive healthcare services, including abortions, are provided.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Gregory Ferguson, AKA \Black Greggo
See United States v. Polanco, 145 F.3d 536 , 540 n. 2 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 803 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999); see also United States v. Malpeso, 115 F.3d 155 , 159 n. 1, 164 (2d Cir.1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gurmeet Singh Dhinsa
See United States v. Miller, 148 F.3d 207, 213 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1072 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 665 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vellone v. FIRST UNION BROKERAGE SERVICES, INC.
(2×)
See LaPrade v. Kidder Peabody & Co., Inc., 146 F.3d 899 (D.C.Cir.1998) (where district court stayed action pending arbitration and plaintiff obtained ex parte order from state court staying arbitration, district court properly lifted stay imposed by state court and entered sanctions against plaintiffs counsel), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999); see also Miller v. Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc., 545 F.2d 1019 (5th Cir.1977) (“[Cjases have held vacation of a stay [pending arbitration] proper where the defendant seeking the stay hindered the progress of arbitrat…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Henke
(2×)
See United States v. Smith, 155 F.3d 1051, 1068-69 (9th Cir.1998), ce rt. denied 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Greer
See United States v. Miller, 148 F.3d 207, 211 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1072 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 665 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Greer
See United States v. Miller, 148 F.3d 207, 211 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1072 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 665 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
LaPrade v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.
(2×)
See LaPrade v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., 146 F.3d 899, 903 (D.C.Cir.1998), cert. den., 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999) (holding that court that stays civil action pending arbitration retains jurisdiction to confirm arbitration award).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ricardo Morales, AKA \Ichi
See United States v. Polanco, 145 F.3d 536, 539 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 803 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Santa
(2×)
See United States v. Miller, 148 F.3d 207, 213 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 665 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diaz
Thus, the motive requisite is satisfied if “ ‘the jury could properly infer that the defendant committed his violent crime because he knew it was expected of him by reason of his membership in the enterprise or that he committed it in furtherance of that membership.’ ” Id.; see United States v. Polanco, 145 F.3d 536, 540 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 803 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999); United States v. Locascio, 6 F.3d 924, 940 (2d Cir.1993). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diaz
Thus, the motive requisite is satisfied if " 'the jury could properly infer that the defendant committed his violent crime because he knew it was expected of him by reason of his membership in the enterprise or that he committed it in furtherance of that membership.' " Id.; see United States v. Polanco, 145 F.3d 536, 540 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 803 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999); United States v. Locascio, 6 F.3d 924, 940 (2d Cir.1993). 1.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gurmeet Singh Dhinsa
See United States v. Miller, 148 F.3d 207, 213 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 665 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 155 F.3d 1051, 1055 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 664 (1999) (citing Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. United States Secret Service, 36 F.3d 457, 462 (5th Cir.1994)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. J. Fred Hart, Jr.
Id.; see also United States v. Weslin, 156 F.3d 292, 297 (2d Cir.1998) (per curiam), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 665 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Operation Rescue National
See also, United States v. Weslin, 156 F.3d 292, 298 (2nd Cir.1998) (rejecting defendants’ mens rea defense that they intended to save the lives of babies, rather than to violate FACE, since that statute merely requires that the defendant intend to in *954 terfere with the obtaining and provision of reproductive services), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 804 , 142 L.Ed.2d 665 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Liddle & Robinson, L. L. P.
v.
Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.
v.
Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.
No. 98-847.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1999.
Cited by 26 opinions | Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.