green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Flaugher
See State v. Anderson, 350 N.C. *377 152, 174, 513 S.E.2d 296, 310 (holding evidence that defendant previously punished her children through use of belt and biting was admitted for permissible purpose because it tended to establish, inter alia, absence of accident), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 973 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wolfer v. Microboards Manufacturing, LLC
(2×)
See Boutin v. LaFleur, 591 N.W.2d 711, 714 (Minn.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 973 , 120 S.Ct. 417 , 145 L.Ed.2d 326 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaiser v. State
(2×)
See Boutin v. LaFleur, 591 N.W.2d 711, 716 (Minn.1999), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 973 , 120 S.Ct. 417 , 145 L.Ed.2d 326 (1999).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Aldridge
(3×)
See State v. Anderson, 350 N.C. 152, 175 , 513 S.E.2d 296, 310 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 973 , 145 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Clark
See State v. Anderson, 350 N.C. 152, 175 , 513 S.E.2d 296, 310 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 973 , 145 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Greene
See State v. Anderson, 350 N.C. 153, 187 , 513 S.E.2d 296, 317 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ____, 120 S.Ct. 417 , 145 L.Ed.2d 326 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Rockford Township v. City of Rockford
See Boutin v. LaFleur, 591 N.W.2d 711, 716 (Minn.1999) (rejecting interpretation that made language of statute redundant), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 417 , 145 L.Ed.2d 326 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jones
See, e.g., State v. Anderson, 350 N.C. 152, 186 , 513 S.E.2d 296, 316 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 973 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Wiley
Ed. 2d 22, 28 (1981) (plurality opinion) (“Without an adequate voir dire, the trial judge’s responsibility to remove prospective jurors who will not be able impartially to follow the court’s instructions and evaluate the evidence cannot be fulfilled.”); see also State v. Anderson, 350 N.C. 152, 170 , 513 S.E.2d 296, 307 (voir dire serves the dual purposes of helping counsel determine whether a basis for a challenge for cause exists and of assisting counsel in exercising peremptory challenges), cer t. denied, 528 U.S. 973 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fosselman v. Commissioner of Human Services
Wisconsin v. Constantineau, 400 U.S. 433, 437 , 91 S.Ct. 507, 510 , 27 L.Ed.2d 515 (1971); see also Boutin v. LaFleur, 591 N.W.2d 711, 718 (Minn.1999) (recognizing liberty interest is implicated when loss of reputation is coupled with loss of another tangible interest), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 417 , 145 L.Ed.2d 326 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rodgers
v.
Ohio
v.
Ohio
No. 99-5997.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1999.
Published
Ct. App. Ohio, Columbiana County. Certiorari denied.