green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.1 score
“we" and "they”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arboleda A. Ortiz, United States of America v. German Sinisterra, United States of America v. Plutarco Tello
See United States v. Edwards, 159 F.3d 1117 , 1125 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 825 , 120 S.Ct. 310 , 145 L.Ed.2d 64 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Collins
See United States v. Edwards, 159 F.3d 1117 , 1124-26 (8th Cir.1998) (use of "we”, "they”, "someone” and "others”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 825 , 120 S.Ct. 309 , 145 L.Ed.2d 64 (1999); United States v. Jones, 101 F.3d 1263 , 1270 & n. 5 (8th Cir.1996) ("we” and "they”), cert. denied,; United States v. Williams, 936 F.2d 698, 700-01 (2d Cir.1991) ("another guy”); United States v. Briscoe, 896 F.2d 1476, 1502 (7th Cir.) ("we”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 863 , 111 S.Ct. 173 , 112 L.Ed.2d 137 (1990); United States v. Garcia, 836 F.2d 385, 390-91 (8th Cir.1987) ("someone”). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arboleda A. Ortiz
See United States v. Edwards, 159 F.3d 1117 , 1125 (8th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 825 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tyrone Werts v. Donald T. Vaughn the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
See Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 , 120 S.Ct. 1495 , 146 L.Ed.2d 389 (2000), and Matteo v. Superintendent, SCI Albion, 171 F.3d 877 (3d Cir.)(en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 120 S.Ct. 73 , 145 L.Ed.2d 62 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hogan v. Gibson
See generally Matteo v. Superintendent, 171 F.3d 877, 885-91 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 73 , - L.Ed.2d - (1999) (summarizing approaches of other circuits and presenting a distinct interpretation).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mazowski
See, e.g., United States v. Edwards, 159 F. 3d 1117 , 1128-29 (8th Cir. 1998) cert. denied, 528 U.S. 825 , 120 S.Ct, 75 , 145 L.Ed. 2d 64 (1999); United States v. Brooks, 125 F. 3d 484 (7th Cir.1997); Adams v. State, 272 Ga. 115 , 527 S.E. 2d 200, 202 (2000); People v. Johnson, 155 A.D. 2d 924 , 547 N.Y.S. 2d 747, 749 (1989), app. den., 75 N.Y. 2d 920 , 555 N.Y.S. 2d 39 , 554 N.E. 2d 76 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker v. City of Blaine
See O’Brien v. Dubois, 145 F.3d 16, 22 (1st Cir.1998); Green v. French, 143 F.3d 865, 870 (4th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1090 , 119 S.Ct. 844 , 142 L.Ed.2d 698 (1999); see also Matteo v. Superintendent, 171 F.3d 877, 887-89 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 73 , 145 L.Ed.2d 62 (1999). 2 On the other hand, if the majority is correct in viewing Moore’s adoption of the dichotomous approach as holding, then the adoption of the contrary approach in Davis and its progeny is equally so.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leka v. Portuondo
Compare Drinkard v. Johnson, 97 F.3d 751, 767 (5th Cir.1996) (holding that the "contrary to” language of § 2254(d)(1) applies to pure questions of law, while the "unreasonable application of” language applies to mixed questions of law and fact), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1107 , 117 S.Ct. 1114 , 137 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997), and Hennon v. Cooper, 109 F.3d 330, 334 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 819 , 118 S.Ct. 72 , 139 L.Ed.2d 32 (1997), and Neelley v. Nagle, 138 F.3d 917, 923-24 (11th Cir.1998) (same), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 811 , 142 L.Ed.2d 671 (1999), with O’Brien v. Dub…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael M. Furman v. Tana Wood
See id.; see also Matteo v. Superintendent, SCI Albion, 171 F.3d 877, 888-89 (3d Cir.1999) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 73 , — L.Ed.2d -, (1999); O’Brien v. Dubois, 145 F.3d 16, 22-23 (1st Cir.1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jobe, Assignee of Air New Orleans, Inc.
v.
ATR Marketing, Inc.
v.
ATR Marketing, Inc.
No. 98-2054.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
Published
Citer courts: D. South Dakota (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.