green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Empresa Cubana Del Tabaco v. Culbro Corp.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Havana Club Holding, S.A. v. Galleon S.A., 203 F.3d 116, 120 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 918 , 121 S.Ct. 277 , 148 L.Ed.2d 201 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Empresa Cubana Del Tabaco v. Culbro Corporation
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Havana Club Holding, S.A. v. Galleon S.A., 203 F.3d 116, 120 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 918 , 121 S.Ct. 277 , 148 L.Ed.2d 201 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Francolino v. Kuhlman
See Francolino v. New York, 531 U.S. 918 , 121 S.Ct. 277, 148 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ahmed v. Attorney General of California
See Park v. California, 202 F.3d 1146, 1150-51 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 918 , 121 S.Ct. 277 , 148 L.Ed.2d 202 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Walsh v. Gomez
See Park v. California, 202 F.3d 1146, 1151-53 (9th Cir.) (addressing Dixon), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 918 , 121 S.Ct. 277 , 148 L.Ed.2d 202 (2000); Calderon v. United States Dist.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co.
Rorer, 19 F.3d at 134 (“the probative value of a consumer survey is a highly fact-specific determination and a court may place such weight on survey evidence as it deems appropriate”); see also Havana Club Holding, S.A. v. Galleon S.A., 203 F.3d 116, 131 (2d Cir.2000) (“A district court has broad discretion concerning the weight of particular evidence, including consumer surveys such as those proffered here-”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 918 , 121 S.Ct. 277 , 148 L.Ed.2d 201 (2000). 10 In addition to challenging the objectivity of the Ford survey, J & J' disputes the District Court’s use…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Douglas Smith v. Terry Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
See, e.g., Park v. California, 202 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 121 S.Ct. 277 , 148 L.Ed.2d 202 (2000); McKenna v. McDaniel, 65 F.3d 1483 (9th Cir.1995); Russell v. Rolfs, 893 F.2d 1033, 1035-36 (9th Cir.1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California
v.
Park
v.
Park
No. 99-1971.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.