green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Sharifi v. State
S4781, S4784 (daily ed. Apr. 2, 1992); but see Ex parte Pressley, 770 So.2d 143, 148 (Ala.) (noting that although the Senate declared that the ICCPR was not self-executing, the Senate's intent was to clarify that the ICCPR did not create a private cause of action), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 931 , 121 S.Ct. 313 , 148 L.Ed.2d 251 (2000).
discussed
Cited "but see"
In re the Personal Restraint of Hegney
But see Ex parte Pressley, 770 So. 2d 143, 148 (Ala.) (noting that although the Senate declared that the ICCPR was not self-executing, the Senate’s intent was to clarify that the ICCPR did not create a private cause of action), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 931 (2000).
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re Hegney
S4781, S4784 (daily ed. Apr. 2, 1992); but see Ex parte Pressley, 770 So.2d 143, 148 (Ala.) (noting that although the Senate declared that the ICCPR was not self-executing, the Senate's intent was to clarify that the ICCPR did not create a private cause of action), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 931 , 121 S.Ct. 313 , 148 L.Ed.2d 251 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tillman v. Verizon New York, Inc.
Dist., 63 F.3d 131, 139 (2d Cir.1995)); see Jackan v. New York State Dep’t of Labor, 205 F.3d 562, 567 (2d Cir.2000) (noting that the plaintiffs burden is not a heavy one and “[i]t is enough .. to suggest the existence of a plausible accommodation, the costs of which, facially, do not clearly exceed its benefits” (quoting Borkowski, 63 F.3d at 138 )), cert denied, 531 U.S. 931 , 121 S.Ct. 314 , 148 L.Ed.2d 251 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Abram v. New York State Division of Human Rights
“Reassignment of a disabled employee to a vacant light-duty position is well established as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA . . . [but petitioner bore the burden] of establishing the existence of such a position at the time [s]he sought the transfer” (id. at 291; see Jackan v New York State Dept. of Labor, 205 F3d 562, 567-568 [2000], cert denied 531 US 931 [2000]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Glozman v. Retail, Wholesale & Chain Store Food Employees Union, Local 338
See Jachan v. New York State Dep’t of *624 Labor, 205 F.3d 562, 566 (2d Cir.2000) (individuals who cannot perform the duties of their current positions can request transfer to a vacant position whose duties they can perform as a reasonable accommodation), cer t. denied, 531 U.S. 931 , 121 S.Ct. 314 , 148 L.Ed.2d 251 (2000); Stone v. City of Mount Vernon, 118 F.3d 92 (2d Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert A. Buell v. Betty Mitchell, Warden
See Ex parte Pressley, 770 So.2d 143, 148-49 (Ala.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 931 , 121 S.Ct. 313 , 148 L.Ed.2d 251 (2000); Domingues v. Nevada, 114 Nev. 783 , 961 P.2d 1279, 1280 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 963 , 120 S.Ct. 396 , 145 L.Ed.2d 309 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark v. State
See also Ex parte Pressley, 770 So.2d 143 (Ala.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 931 , 121 S.Ct. 313 , 148 L.Ed.2d 251 (2000); Duke v. State, 889 So.2d 1 (Ala.Crim.App.2002); McGriff v. State, [Ms. CR-97-0179, September 29, 2000] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Crim.App.2000); Perkins v. State, 808 So.2d 1041 (Ala.Crim.App.1999), aff'd, 808 So.2d 1143 (Ala.2001), judgment vacated on other grounds, 536 U.S. 953 , 122 S.Ct. 2653 , 153 L.Ed.2d 830 (2002), on remand to 851 So.2d 453 (Ala.2002); Wilson v. State, 777 So.2d 856 (Ala.Crim.App.1999), aff'd, 777 So.2d 935 (Ala.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1097 , 121 S.Ct. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lovejoy-Wilson v. Noco Motor Fuels, Inc.
See, e.g., Jackan v. New York State Dep’t of Labor, 205 F.3d 562, 566 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 931 , 121 S.Ct. 314 , 148 L.Ed.2d 251 (2000) (citing Beck v. Univ. of Wis. Bd. of Regents, 75 F.3d 1130, 1135 (7th Cir.1996)); see also Rehling v. City of Chicago, 207 F.3d 1009, 1015-16 (7th Cir.2000) (plaintiff cannot base ADA “reasonable accommodation” claim solely on allegation that the employer failed to engage in interactive process); Willis v. Conopco, Inc., 108 F.3d 282, 285 (11th Cir.1997) (no ADA liability merely for failing to engage in interactive process itself).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Belzel
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 00-5089.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 2000.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.