Alexander v. Mineta, 531 U.S. 940 (2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Alexander v. Mineta, 531 U.S. 940 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “[T]he dictates of the Constitution and the decisions of the Supreme Court bar us” from granting District residents the “right to elect representatives to the Congress of the United States.”
38 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Igartúa v. Obama (ca1, 2016-11-23)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Igartúa v. Obama
1st Cir. · 2016 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
judgment affirmed.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Banner v. United States
D.D.C. · 2004 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he dictates of the constitution and the decisions of the supreme court bar us" from granting district residents the "right to elect representatives to the congress of the united states.
cited Cited "see" Banner, James M. v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adams v. Clinton, 90 F.Supp.2d 35 , 47 n. 19 (D.D.C.) (three-judge court), aff'd, 531 U.S. 941 , 121 S.Ct. 336 , 148 L.Ed.2d 270 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Armfield v. United States
D.C. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adams v. Clinton, 90 F.Supp.2d 35, 67-68 (D.D.C.) (dismissing a suit by District of Columbia citizens seeking the right to vote, for a member of Congress because the Constitution grants that right only to residents of the states, not to residents of the District), aff'd, 531 U.S. 941 , 121 S.Ct. 336 , 148 L.Ed.2d 270 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez, United States of America v. Santiago Gilberto Sanchez
11th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hester, 199 F.3d 1287 (11th Cir.), vacated and remanded, 531 U.S. 941 , 121 S.Ct. 336 , 148 L.Ed.2d 270 (2000). 31 Hester represented the first serious encounter between our prior statutory interpretation and the constitutional rule of Apprendi , which at that time existed in more embryonic form as footnote six of Jones .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Aaron Larmar Rogers
11th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hester, 199 F.3d 1287, 1292 (11th Cir.2000), ce rt. granted, judgment vacated and remanded, — U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 336 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Samuel O. White, Luis Noel Cruz, AKA Danny Cruz
2d Cir. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Thomas v. United States, - U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 749 , 148 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001); see also, e.g., United States v. Hester, 199 F.3d 1287, 1291-92 (11th Cir.), vacated and remanded, - U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 336 , 148 L.Ed.2d 270 (2000); United States v. Jones, 194 F.3d 1178, 1186 (10th Cir.1999), vacated and remanded, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2739 , 147 L.Ed.2d 1002 (2000), on remand 235 F.3d 1231, 1236-37 (10th Cir.2000) (finding that failure to include drug quantity in an indictment for drug distribution under 21 U.S.C. 841(a) and to present the question to the jury violated Apprendi). 10 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alexander
v.
Mineta, Secretary of Commerce
No. 99-2062.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 16, 2000.
531 U.S. 940
Jurisdiction, Set, Would.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: First Circuit (1) · District of Columbia (1)

Affirmed on appeal from D. C. D. C.

Justice Stevens would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.