Pozo v. McCaughtry, 537 U.S. 949 (2002). · Go Syfert
Pozo v. McCaughtry, 537 U.S. 949 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: James Miller v. Larry Norris (ca8, 2004-03-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" James Miller v. Larry Norris
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022, 1023-25 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 949 , 123 S.Ct. 414 , 154 L.Ed.2d 293 (2002).
examined Cited "see" Douglas Thomas v. Shawn Woolum, Richard Kepler Charlotte Starcher Billie Waddell, Sr. (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
6th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022, 1025 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 949 , 123 S.Ct. 414 , 154 L.Ed.2d 293 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Thomas v. Woolum
6th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022, 1025 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, -- Although there may be an “interplay” between the two U.S. --, 123 S. Ct. 414 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Ashford v. Hahn
10th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pozo v. McCaughtry , 286 F.3d 1022, 1023-24 (7th Cir.), cert. denied , 123 S. Ct. 414 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Townes v. Paule
S.D. Cal. · 2005 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Ross v. County of Bernalillo, 365 F.3d 1181, 1186 (10th Cir.2004) (“[T]he PLRA, like 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , contains a procedural default concept within its exhaustion requirement.”), and Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied 537 U.S. 949 , 123 S.Ct. 414 , 154 L.Ed.2d 293 (2002), with Thomas v. Woolum, 337 F.3d 720, 723 (6th Cir.2003) (“[W]e hold that so long as an inmate presents his or her grievance to prison officials and appeals through the available procedures, the inmate has exhausted his or her administrative remedies, and a prison’s decision not…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.A
3rd Cir. · 2004 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Ross v. County of Bernalillo, 365 F.3d 1181, 1186 (10th Cir.2004) (“[T]he PLRA, like 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , contains a procedural default concept within its exhaustion requirement.”), and Pozo v. McCaughtry, 286 F.3d 1022 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied 537 U.S. 949 , 123 S.Ct. 414 , 154 L.Ed.2d 293 (2002), with Thomas v. Woolum, 337 F.3d 720, 723 (6th Cir.2003) (“[W]e hold that so long as an inmate presents his or her grievance to prison officials and appeals through the available procedures, the inmate has exhausted his or her administrative remedies, and a prison’s decision not…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pozo
v.
McCaughtry
02-204.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 2002.
537 U.S. 949
Published

537 U.S. 949

POZO
v.
McCAUGHTRY ET AL.

No. 02-204.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 15, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 286 F. 3d 1022.