green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services
(2×)
See In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340, 352-54 (Tex.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 , 124 S.Ct. 1674 , 158 L.Ed.2d 371 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Frederick Dewayne Walker v. Department of Family and Protective Services
See In re B.L.D. , 113 S.W.3d 340, 352-54 (Tex. 2003), cert. denied , 124 S. Ct. 1674 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Astoria Industries of Iowa, Inc. v. SNF, Inc.
See 113 S.W.3d 340 , 349 (Tex.2003) (holding that an appellate court generally will decide constitutional questions only when it cannot resolve issues on nonconstitutional grounds), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 , 124 S.Ct. 1674 , 158 L.Ed.2d 371 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
in Re Benevis, LLC, Dentistry of Brownsville, P.C., and Kool Smiles, P.C.
Spears, 797 S.W.2d at 656 . 11 Id.; see also In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340 , 346 n. 5 [5] The relators argue that disqualification was improper (Tex.2003) (discussing waiver for joint representation), because V & E obtained valid oral and written waivers cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 , 124 S.Ct. 1674 , 158 L.Ed.2d before appearing in this lawsuit on the relators' behalf.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., Children
In re Doe 2, 19 S.W.3d 278, 284 (Tex.2000) (holding facial constitutional challenge based on Separation of Powers Clause not properly considered on appeal where not raised in trial court); see In re R.B., 225 S.W.3d 798, 802 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2007, no pet.) (holding constitutional challenge based on facial invalidity of statute in parental termination case waived when not raised in trial court); see also In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340, 354-55 (Tex.2003) (holding courts of appeals must not retreat from error preservation standards to review unpreserved error in parental rights termination case…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re DW
P. 33.1(a). [7] Bushell v. Dean, 803 S.W.2d 711, 712 (Tex. 1991) (op. on reh'g). [8] In re Doe 2, 19 S.W.3d 278, 284 (Tex.2000) (holding facial constitutional challenge based on Separation of Powers Clause not properly considered on appeal where not raised in trial court); see In re R.B., 225 S.W.3d 798, 802 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2007, no pet.) (holding constitutional challenge based on facial invalidity of statute in parental termination case waived when not raised in trial court); see also In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340, 354-55 (Tex.2003) (holding courts of appeals must not retreat from error p…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.
Id.; see also In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340 , 346 n. 5 (Tex.2003) (discussing waiver for joint representation), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 , 124 S.Ct. 1674 , 158 L.Ed.2d 371 (2004). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
in the Interest of T.H.L.D., a Child
Bushell v. Dean , 803 S.W.2d 711, 712 (Tex. 1991) (op. on reh'g); see also In re B.L.D. , 113 S.W.3d 340, 354-55 (Tex. 2003) (holding that court of appeals must not retreat from error-preservation standards to review unpreserved error in parental rights termination cases), cert. denied , 124 S. Ct. 1674 (2004); In re D.T.M. , 932 S.W.2d 647, 652 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no writ) (holding that even constitutional arguments are waived if not raised in the trial court).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
in the Interest of T.H.L.D., a Child
Bushell v. Dean , 803 S.W.2d 711, 712 (Tex. 1991) (op. on reh'g); see also In re B.L.D. , 113 S.W.3d 340, 354-55 (Tex. 2003) (holding that court of appeals must not retreat from error-preservation standards to review unpreserved error in parental rights termination cases), cert. denied , 124 S. Ct. 1674 (2004); In re D.T.M. , 932 S.W.2d 647, 652 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no writ) (holding that even constitutional arguments are waived if not raised in the trial court).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Walter John RASON
v.
F. Wayne ELGGREN, Chapter 7 Trustee
v.
F. Wayne ELGGREN, Chapter 7 Trustee
No. 03-8428.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 2004.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.