green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Wildearth Guardians v. Salazar
United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 566 F.3d 1095, 1146 (D.C.Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3501 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1090 (2010); but see Roeder v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 333 F.3d 228, 233 (D.C.Cir.2003) (noting that “[requiring standing of someone who seeks to intervene as a defendant runs into the doctrine that the standing inquiry is directed at those who invoke the court’s jurisdiction.”) (internal citations omitted), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 915 , 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 287 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Deegan Patterson v. United States
See Skwira v. United States, 344 F.3d 64, 72 (1st Cir.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 903 , 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 267 (2004); Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1).
cited
Cited "see"
Crutsinger v. State
See Jones v. State, 119 S.W.3d 766, 790 (Tex.Crim.App.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 270 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Paul Revere Life Insurance v. Bromberg
See Skwira v. United States, 344 F.3d 64, 71-72 (1st Cir.2003), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 267 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ramos v. State
Compare Rubio v. State, 241 S.W.3d 1, 9-11 (Tex.Crim.App.2007) Crawford error), Clay, 240 S.W.3d at 904-05 (Crawford error), Scott v. State, 227 S.W.3d 670, 690-95 (Tex.Crim.App.2007) (Crawford error), Davis v. State, 203 *362 S.W.3d 845, 850-53 (Tex.Crim.App.2006) (Crawford error), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1344 , 127 S.Ct. 2037 , 167 L.Ed.2d 774 (2007), Jones v. State, 119 S.W.3d 766, 777-82 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) (erroneous admission of confession), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 270 (2004), and McCarthy v. State, 65 S.W.3d at 52-56 (erroneous admission of confession), …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beer v. Islamic Republic of Iran
Legal Standard for FSIA Default Judgment Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, no judgment by default *9 shall be entered by a court unless the claimant establishes his claim or right to relief by evidence satisfactory to the court. 28 U.S.C. § 1608 (e); see also Roeder v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 333 F.3d 228, 232 (D.C.Cir.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 915 , 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 287 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Acosta v. the Islamic Republic of Iran
Legal Standard for FSIA Default Judgment Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, no judgment by default shall be entered by a court unless the claimant establishes his claim or right to relief by evidence satisfactory to the court. 28 U.S.C. § 1608 (e); see also Roeder v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 333 F.3d 228, 232 (D.C.Cir.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 915 , 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 287 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rimkus v. Islamic Republic of Iran
Legal Standard for FSIA Default Judgment Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, no judgment by default shall be entered by a court unless the claimant establishes his claim or right to relief by evidence satisfactory to the court. 28 U.S.C. § 1608 (e); see also Roeder v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 333 F.3d 228, 232 (D.C.Cir.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 915 , 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 287 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kirschenbaum v. Islamic Republic of Iran
Legal Standard for FSIA Default Judgment Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, no judgment by default shall be entered by a court unless the claimant establishes his claim or right to *209 relief by evidence satisfactory to the court. 28 U.S.C. § 1608 (e); see also Roeder v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 333 F.3d 228, 232 (D.C.Cir.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 915 , 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 287 (2004).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tachiona v. United States
See, e.g., Roeder v. Iran, 333 F.3d 228, 233-34 (D.C.Cir.2003), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 287 (2004).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tachiona v. United States
See, e.g., Roeder v. Iran, 333 F.3d 228, 233-34 (D.C.Cir.2003), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 287 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chomic v. United States
See, e.g., Skwira v. United States, 344 F.3d 64, 75 (1st Cir.2003), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 267 (2004); Garza v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 284 F.3d 930, 934 (8th Cir.2002); Diaz v. United States, 165 F.3d 1337, 1340 (11th Cir.1999); In Re Swine Flu Prods.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chomic v. USA
See, e.g., Skwira v. United States, 344 F.3d 64, 75 (1st Cir.2003), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 267 (2004); Garza v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 284 F.3d 930, 934 (8th Cir.2002); Diaz v. United States, 165 F.3d 1337, 1340 (11th Cir.1999); In Re Swine Flu Prods.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Massachusetts
v.
Massachusetts
03-8661.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 2004.
Published
App. Ct. Mass. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.