green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Djenasevic v. Executive United States Attorney's Office
See Bethea v. United States Parole Comm’n, 56 Fed.Appx. 514, 515 (D.C.Cir.2003) (per curiam) (assuming without deciding that a federal prisoner must exhaust administrative remedies under the PLRA before pursuing a Privacy Act claim in district court), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 880 , 124 S.Ct. 311 , 157 L.Ed.2d 145 (2003); Reid v. Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Del Valle
See Cinel v. Connick, 15 F.3d 1338, 1345 (5th Cir. 1994). 2 . 319 F.3d 677 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, •— U.S. --, 124 S.Ct. 311 , - L.Ed.2d - (2003). 3 . 312 F.3d 164, 167-68 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1811 , 155 L.Ed.2d 689 (2003). 4 . 523 U.S. 224, 239-47 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). 5 . 530 U.S. 466, 490 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). 6 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bethea
v.
United States Parole Commission
v.
United States Parole Commission
03-172.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
Published
BETHEA
v.
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION ET AL.
No. 03-172.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 6, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. D. C. Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 56 Fed. Appx. 514.