discussed Cited "see" Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Marketing on Hold Inc. (2×) See Klay v. Humana, Inc., 382 F.3d 1241, 1258-59 (11th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1081 , 125 S.Ct. 877 , 160 L.Ed.2d 825 (2005) (reasoning that where the defendant's alleged misconduct is standardized, circumstantial evidence can be used to show class-wide reliance).

discussed Cited "see" Iliadis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (2×) See Carnegie v. Household Int’l, Inc., 376 F.3d 656, 661 (7th Cir.2004) (“The realistic alternative to a class action is not ... million[s of] individual suits, but zero individual suits.”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1051 , 125 S.Ct. 877 , 160 L.Ed.2d 772 (2005).

discussed Cited "see" Murray v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. See Murry, 2005 WL 1323364 at *9 (stating that “the existence of individual damages issues will not generally preclude certification”) (quoting Carnegie v. Household Int’l, Inc., 376 F.3d 656, 660-661 (7th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1051 , 125 S.Ct. 877 , 160 L.Ed.2d 772 (2005)); see also Ciccarone v. B.J.

cited Cited "see" Denney v. Jenkens & Gilchrist See Klay v. Humana, 382 F.3d 1241 (11th Cir.2004), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 877 , 160 L.Ed.2d 825 (2005).