Caldwell v. United States, 126 S. Ct. 366 (Fed. Cir. 2005). · Go Syfert
Caldwell v. United States, 126 S. Ct. 366 (Fed. Cir. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events (42 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Thompson v. United States (uscfc, 2011-10-13)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Thompson v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Caldwell v. United States, 391 F.3d 1226, 1233, 1235 (Fed.Cir.2004), ce rt. denied 546 U.S. 826 , 126 S.Ct. 366 , 163 L.Ed.2d 72 (2005) (“The taking, if any, when a railroad right-of-way is converted to interim trail use under the [Rails-To-]Trails Act occurs when state law reversionary property interests that would otherwise vest in the adjacent landowners are blocked from so vesting.” “We ... hold that the appropriate triggering event for any takings claim under the [Rails-To-]Trails Act occurs when the NITU is issued.”).
cited Cited "see" Society of Lloyd's v. Bennett
10th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Soc’y of Lloyd’s v. Reinhart, 402 F.3d 982 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 366 , 163 L.Ed.2d 73 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Resource Investments, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Hendler court further recognized that “[a]ll takings are ‘temporary,’ in the sense that the government can always change its mind at a later time, and this is true whether the property interest taken is a possessory estate for years or a fee simple acquired through condemnation, or an easement of use by virtue of a regulation.” Id.; see also Caldwell v. United States, 391 F.3d 1226, 1234 (Fed.Cir.2004) (observing that the precise nature of the takings claim, including whether it is permanent or temporary, may be unknown when it accrues), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 826 , 126 S.Ct. 366 ,…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William B. CALDWELL, III
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 04-1728.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Oct 3, 2005.
126 S. Ct. 366
Published
THE CHIEF JUSTICE

took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.