discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ernest Cook, III See United States v. Taylor, 659 F.3d 339, 343-4 (4th Cir.2011) (upholding validity of U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4)(A) enhancement despite the fact that it lacks a mens rea requirement), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1817 , 182 L.Ed.2d 634 (2012).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Keith Jones United States v. West, 550 F.3d 952, 958-59 (10th Cir.2008) (holding that affirmative concession in district court that prior conviction was predicate offense for ACCA purposes waived argument on appeal), overruled on other grounds as recognized by United States v. Smith, 652 F.3d 1244, 1246 (10th Cir.2011); see United States v. Taylor, 659 F.3d 339, 348 (4th Cir.2011) (“[T]he defendant is deemed bound by the acts of his lawyer-agent.”) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1817 , 182 L.Ed.2d 634 (2012).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Dennis Sutton See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 733 , 113 S.Ct. 1770 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993) (“[W]aiver is the intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right.” (internal quotation marks omitted)); United States v. West, 550 F.3d 952, 958-59 (10th Cir.2008) (finding that defendant waived challenge to prior conviction as predicate offense for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act by affirmatively conceding issue in district court), partially overruled on other grounds as recognized by United States v. Smith, 652 F.3d 1244, 1246 (10th Cir.2011); see also United States v. Taylor, 65…