discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Henderson, C. See Henderson v. Pennsylvania, 133 S. Ct. 435 (U.S. 2012); see also Commonwealth v. Henderson, No. 1177 WDA 2014 (Pa. Super. filed April 19, 2016); Commonwealth v. Henderson, No. 318 WDA 2015 (Pa. Super. filed April 20, 2016).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ernest Cadet v. State of Florida Department of Corrections (2×) In fact, the Court noted that one of the aims of equity — and thus, equitable tolling — is “to relieve hardships which, from time to time, arise from a hard and fast adherence to more absolute legal rules, which, if strictly applied, threaten the evils of archaic rigidity.” Id. at 649-51, 130 S.Ct. at 2563 (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Hutchinson v. Florida, 677 F.3d 1097, 1098 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 435 , 184 L.Ed.2d 266 (2012) (Carnes, J.) (“Equitable tolling is, well, equitable in nature.... ”).