Au Optronics Corp. v. South Carolina, 134 S. Ct. 999 (2014). · Go Syfert
Search
Au Optronics Corp. v. South Carolina, 134 S. Ct. 999 (2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events (58 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wallace Boudreaux v. Transocean Deepwater, Inc. (ca5, 2016-02-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Wallace Boudreaux v. Transocean Deepwater, Inc.
5th Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Transocean Deepwater, Inc. v. Boudreaux, — U.S. -, 134 act 1001, 187 L.Ed.2d 850 (2014) (denying certiorari).
cited Cited "see" Geoffrey Narcisco Rivera v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Va. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 999 , 187 L.Ed.2d 848 (2014) (granting certiorari on January 17, 2014).
examined Cited "see" United States v. Clark (3×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
E.D. Tenn. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wurie, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 999 , 187 L.Ed.2d 848 (2014); Riley v. California, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 999 , 187 L.Ed.2d 847 (2014).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Johnny Grooms
6th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wurie, 728 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.2013), cert.granted, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 999 , 187 L.Ed.2d 848 (2014).
examined Cited "see" State of Texas v. Granville, Anthony (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Tex. Crim. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wurie, 612 F.Supp.2d 104, 109 (D.Mass.2009) ("It seems indisputable that a person has a subjective expectation of privacy in the contents of his or her cell phone.”), rev’d on other grounds, 728 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.2013), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 999 , 187 L.Ed.2d 848 , 82 U.S.L.W. 3104 (2014) (upholding defendant's privacy interest and holding that warrantless search of cell phone taken from an arrestee was unconstitutional).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Post
S.D. Tex. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wurie, 728 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.2013), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 999 , 187 L.Ed.2d 848 (2014); People v. Riley, 2013 WL 475242 (Cal.Ct.App.2013), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 999 , 187 L.Ed.2d 848 (2014).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ali Bashir Mohamed v. U.S. Attorney General
11th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Mohammed v. Ashcroft, 261 F.3d 1244, 1247 (11th Cir.2001); see also Perez-Guerrero v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 717 F.3d 1224, 1231 (11th Cir.2013), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1000 , 187 L.Ed.2d 850 (2014) (reviewing as a question of law whether the BIA gave reasoned consideration to an issue).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Shawn Alvin Tracey v. State of Florida (2×)
Fla. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Wurie, 728 F.3d 1, 13 (1st Cir.2013) (holding that a war-rantless search of the defendant's cell phone as incident to his arrest violates the Fourth Amendment), cert. granted, Wurie, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 999 , 187 L.Ed.2d 848 (2014). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re Standard & Poor's Rating Agency Litigation (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., AU Optronics Corp. v. South Carolina, 699 F.3d 385, 392-94 (4th Cir.2012), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 999 , 187 L.Ed.2d 850 (2014); LG Display Co., Ltd. v. Madigan, 665 F.3d 768, 773 (7th Cir.2011); Bank of Am., 672 F.3d at 671 ; see also, e.g., MyInfoGuard v. Sorrell, Nos. 2:12-cv074, 2:12-cv-102, 2012 WL 5469913 , at *4-5 (D.Vt.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Wicks
C.A.A.F. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Wurie, 728 F.3d 1, 8-9 (1st Cir.2013), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 999 , 187 L.Ed.2d 848 (2014); United States v. Flores-Lopez, 670 F.3d 803, 805-06 (7th Cir.2012); United States v. Murphy, 552 F.3d 405, 411 (4th Cir.2009); United States v. Zavala, 541 F.3d 562, 577 (5th Cir.2008); see also United States v. Yockey, No. CR09-4023-MWB, U.S. Dist.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 12–911..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 2014.
134 S. Ct. 999
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.