Chapman v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 882 (2014). · Go Syfert
Search
Chapman v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 882 (2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“although the district court need not explicitly discuss each 3553(a) factor, the statement of reasons must demonstrate that the district court at least considered each factor when determining the appropriate sentence.”
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Brown (mied, 2016-07-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Brown
E.D. Mich. · 2016 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
although the district court need not explicitly discuss each 3553(a) factor, the statement of reasons must demonstrate that the district court at least considered each factor when determining the appropriate sentence.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jamal Vassie
8th Cir. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bassett, 762 F.3d 681, 685 (8th Cir.) (defining conspiracy to commit bank robbery), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 882 , 190 L.Ed.2d 712 (2014); United States v. House, 825 F.3d 381, 386-87 (8th Cir. 2016) (defining Hobbs Act robbery), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 137 S.Ct. 1124 , 197 L.Ed.2d 223 (2017); United States v. McArthur, 850 F.3d 925, 941 (8th Cir. 2017) (defining aiding and abetting a § 924(c) offense).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Dean CHAPMAN
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 14–7036..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 2014.
135 S. Ct. 882
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 61%
Citer courts: E.D. Michigan (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.