discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Christopher Savage cottonwood

discussed Cited "see" Boneta v. Rolex Watch USA, Inc. See Turkmen v. Hasty, 789 F.3d 218, 263 (2d Cir. 2015) (“[Defendants—officers and directors of a single corporation, and the corporation itself—could not legally conspire with one another ... because the defendants formed a ‘single business entity with a managerial policy implemented by the one governing board.’ Thus, the defendants could not satisfy the statutory requirement of a conspiracy between two or more persons.”) (quoting Girard v. 94th Street & Fifth Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66, 70-72 (2d Cir. 1976)), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 293 , 196 L.Ed.2d 211 (2016).

discussed Cited "see" Haywood v. Hathaway (2×) See Ziglar v. Turkmen, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 292 , 196 L.Ed.2d 211 (2016) (consolidated with Ashcroft v. Turkmen, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 293 , 196 L.Ed.2d 211 (2016), and Hasty v. Turkmen, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 293 , 196 L.Ed.2d 211 (2016)).