Diehl-Armstrong v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 317 (2016). · Go Syfert
Search
Diehl-Armstrong v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 317 (2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“he pres ence .. of 'professional or managerial discretion' represents the decisive factor in deciding whether a defendant occupied a position of trust.”
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: United States v. Swanson (ca9, 2017-06-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Swanson
9th Cir. · 2017 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he pres ence .. of 'professional or managerial discretion' represents the decisive factor in deciding whether a defendant occupied a position of trust.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Nelli Kesoyan
9th Cir. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
Persons holding such positions ordinarily are subject to 3 18-10170 significantly less supervision than employees whose responsibilities are primarily non-discretionary in nature.” U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3, cmt. n.1; see also United States v. Adebimpe, 819 F.3d 1212, 1217 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 317 (2016).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marjorie DIEHL-ARMSTRONG
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 16–5764..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 2016.
137 S. Ct. 317
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 69%
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.