green
Positive treatment
0.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Potomac Transport, Inc. v. Ogden Marine, Inc.
In fact, "[w]hile a single series of events indicating gross negligence or mismanagement of the vessel may not be conclusive criteria determining the competency of the crew, certain instances can be revealing with regard to this issue." In re Ta Chi Navigation (Panama) Corp., S.A., 513 F.Supp. 148, 159 (E.D.La.1981), aff'd, 728 F.2d 699 (5th Cir.1984); accord McGill v. Michigan Steamship Co., 144 F. 788, 795-96 (9th Cir.) (errors in navigation may be so extreme as to raise a presumption of the crew's incompetence), cert. denied, 203 U.S. 593 , 27 S.Ct. 782 , 51 L.Ed. 332 (1906); The Cygnet, 12…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bangladesh Shipping Corp. v. Ogden Marine, Inc.
In fact, “[wjhile a single series of events indicating gross negligence or mismanagement of the vessel may not be conclusive criteria determining the competency of the crew, certain instances can be revealing with regard to this issue.” In re Ta Chi Navigation (Panama) Corp., S.A., 513 F.Supp. 148, 159 (E.D.La.1981), aff'd, 728 F.2d 699 (5th Cir.1984); accord McGill v. Michigan Steamship Co., 144 F. 788, 795-96 (9th Cir.) (errors in navigation may be so extreme as to raise a presumption of the crew’s incompetence), cert. denied, 203 U.S. 593 , 27 S.Ct. 782 , 51 L.Ed. 332 (1906); The Cygn…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David Lamar, in Error
v.
Albert G. Spalding
v.
Albert G. Spalding
No. 110.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 19, 1906.
Mr. Alan H. Strong and Mr. Harry Allen Mendelson for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edmund .Wilson for defendant in error.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
In error to the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey.
Per Curiam.Judgment affirmed with costs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Schmidt, 177 U. S. 230. Case below, 68 N. J. Eq. 686.