green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1939 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1939
1982
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ameritech, Inc., an Ohio Corporation v. American Information Technologies Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, D/B/A Ameritech
(2×)
See, e.g., Vogue Co. v. Thompson-Hudson Co., 300 Fed. 509 (6th Cir.1924), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 706 , 47 S.Ct. 98 , 71 L.Ed. 850 (1926); Pro-Phy-Lac-Tic Brush Co. v. Jordan Marsh Co., 165 F.2d 549, 553 (1st Cir.1948).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Dad's Root Beer Co. v. Doc's Beverages, Inc.
(4×)
See also Vogue Co. v. Thompson-Hudson Co., 6 Cir., 300 F. 509 , certiorari denied 273 U.S. 706 , 47 S.Ct. 98 , 71 L.Ed. 850 ; Lady Esther, Ltd. v. Lady Esther Corset Shoppe, 317 Ill.App. 451 , 46 N.E.2d 165 , 148 A.L.R. 6 , and cases collected in annotation following at page 12; Note, 38 Harv.L.Rev. 370.
H. M. Albury
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 461.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 18, 1926.
Mr. Bart A. Riley for petitioner., Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Mr. K. L. Campbell for the United States.
Published
Petition for a- writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.