green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1941 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1941
1983
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
George Fabe, Superintendent of Insurance, State of Ohio v. United States Department of the Treasury Mitchell A. Levine, Assistant Commissioner
(2×)
See Motlow v. Southern Holding & Securities Corp., 95 F.2d 721, 725-26 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 609 , 59 S.Ct. 68 , 83 L.Ed. 388 (1938); In re Peoria Life Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Law Enforcement Insurance Company, Ltd. v. James P. Corcoran
See Motlow v. Southern Holding & Securities Corp., 95 F.2d 721, 724 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 609 , 59 S.Ct. 68 , 83 L.Ed. 388 (1938).
cited
Cited "see"
Insurance Affiliates, Inc. v. O'CONNOR
See Motlow v. Southern Holding & Securities Corp., 95 F.2d 721, 725-26 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 609 , 59 S.Ct. 68 , 83 L.Ed. 388 (1938).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Idaho v. United States
See, e.g., Motlow v. Southern Holding & Securities Corp., 95 F.2d 721, 725-26 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 609 , 59 S.Ct. 68 , 83 L.Ed. 388 (1938) (like any other corporation, liquidation of insurance companies is best performed by a single entity possessing title, custody, and control of all assets; vis-a-vis insurers, Congress has left that authority in the states); Levy v. Lewis, 635 F.2d 960, 963-64 (2d Cir.1980) (quoting Motlow and stating that "the administrative and judicial scheme erected by New York to regulate insurance companies, including that part enabling the institution an…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lac D'Amiante du Quebec v. American Home Assurance Co.
See also Motlow v. Southern Holding & Securities Corp., 95 F.2d 721, 725-26 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 609 , 59 S.Ct. 68 , 83 L.Ed. 388 (1938). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lac D'amiante Du Quebec, Ltee v. American Home Assurance Company
See also Motlow v. Southern Holding & Securities Corp., 95 F.2d 721, 725-26 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 609 , 59 S.Ct. 68 , 83 L.Ed. 388 (1938). 10 Our analysis proceeds on the understanding that the New York courts must give res judicata effect to the decision of the federal district court despite that court's failure to give full faith and credit to the state court's injunction.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Idaho ex rel. Soward v. United States
See, e.g., Motlow v. Southern Holding & Securities Corp., 95 F.2d 721, 725-26 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 609 , 59 S.Ct. 68 , 83 L.Ed. 388 (1938) (like any other corporation, liquidation of insurance companies is best performed by a single entity possessing title, custody, and control of all assets; vis-a-vis insurers, Congress has left that authority in the states); Levy v. Lewis, 635 F.2d 960, 963-64 (2d Cir.1980) (quoting Motlow and stating that “the administrative and judicial scheme erected by New York to regulate insurance companies, including that part enabling the institution …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Motlow
v.
Southern Holding & Securities Corp.
v.
Southern Holding & Securities Corp.
No. 92.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1938.
Messrs. Patrick H. Cullen and Clem F. Storckman for petitioner., Mr. John S. Leahy for respondent Southern Holding & Securities Corporation., Messrs. John T. Harding and David A. Murphy for respondents Home Insurance Co. et al.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.