Haskins v. Roseberry, 314 U.S. 655 (1941). · Go Syfert
Haskins v. Roseberry, 314 U.S. 655 (1941). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hartwell Corp. v. Smith (idahoctapp, 1984-06-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Hartwell Corp. v. Smith
Idaho Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haskins v. Roseberry, 119 F.2d 803 (9th Cir.1941), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 655 , 62 S.Ct. 106 , 86 L.Ed. 525 (1941).
discussed Cited "see" Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,502 Howard H. Mason v. Bradley Unkeless (2×)
9th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
Even if Mason's investment in the Lancelles' business were an investment contract within the definition of a federal security, 3 Unkeless could not be held liable on the basis of a conversation in which there was no suggestion whatever that Mason purchase a security. 10 This does not mean that a securities defendant must know that the conduct in which he is engaging is proscribed, Byrnes v. Faulkner, Dawkins & Sullivan, 413 F.Supp. 453, 470 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff'd, 550 F.2d 1303 (2d Cir. 1977); see SEC v. Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Association, Inc., 120 F.2d 738 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 31…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Huston
Tex. App. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Stein v. Delano, 121 F.2d 975, 978 (3rd Cir.1941), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 655 , 62 S.Ct. 106 , 86 L.Ed. 525 (1941); 3 MI-CHIE, BANKS AND BANKING sec. 220; 9 ZOLLMAN, THE LAW OF BANKS AND BANKING sec. 6482.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Haskins, Receiver
v.
Roseberry
No. 353.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1941.
314 U.S. 655
Messrs. Thomas F. Ryan, Joseph M. Hartfield, and Eugene Frederick Roth for petitioner. Messrs. George B. Thatcher and William Woodburn for respondents.
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.