green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1945 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1945
1985
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. American Principals Holding, Inc. (In re San Vicente Medical Partners Ltd.)
See In re Chicago Rapid Transit Co., 129 F.2d 1, 6 (7th Cir.) (section 959(b), formerly 28 U.S.C. § 124 (1940), requires only that the receiver or trustee operate the property in accordance with state laws), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 683 , 63 S.Ct. 205 , 87 L.Ed. 547 (1942).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. American Principals Holding, Inc.
See In re Chicago Rapid Transit Co., 129 F.2d 1, 6 (7th Cir.) (section 959(b), formerly 28 U.S.C. § 124 (1940), requires only that the receiver or trustee operate the property in accordance with state laws), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 683 , 63 S.Ct. 205 , 87 L.Ed. 547 (1942).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re San Vicente Medical Partners Ltd., Debtor. Securities & Exchange Commission v. American Principals Holding, Inc., San Vicente Medical Partners, Ltd., Debtor-In-Possession-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Ashley S. Orr, Receiver of American Principals Corporation, a California Corporation, Receiver-Cross-Defendant-Appellee
See In re Chicago Rapid Transit Co., 129 F.2d 1, 6 (7th Cir.) (section 959(b), formerly 28 U.S.C. § 124 (1940), requires only that the receiver or trustee operate the property in accordance with state laws), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 683 , 63 S.Ct. 205 , 87 L.Ed. 547 (1942).
discussed
Cited "see"
In The Matter Of Quanta Resources Corp.
(2×)
See In re Chicago Rapid Transit Co., 129 F.2d 1, 4-5 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 683 , 63 S.Ct. 205 , 87 L.Ed. 547 (1942). 27 The paramount purpose of bankruptcy liquidation and administration is the reduction of a bankrupt's property to money as expeditiously as practicable, so as to secure funds for distribution to general creditors.
discussed
Cited "see"
City of New York v. Quanta Resources Corp.
(2×)
See In re Chicago Rapid Transit Co., 129 F.2d 1, 4-5 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 683 , 63 S.Ct. 205 , 87 L.Ed. 547 (1942).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chicago Junction Railroad Co.
v.
Sprague
v.
Sprague
No. 465.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 23, 1942.
Messrs. George Wharton Pepper, Silas H. Strawn, Ralph M. Shaw, and John D. Black for petitioner. Messrs. Thomas L. Marshall and David A. Watts for respondents.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.