Dill Mfg. Co. v. Goff, 317 U.S. 672 (1942). · Go Syfert
Search
Dill Mfg. Co. v. Goff, 317 U.S. 672 (1942). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Douglas v. United States (dc, 1990-02-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1946 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1946 1986 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Douglas v. United States
D.C. · 1990 · signal: accord · confidence high
While such proof is not explicitly mandated by our burglary statute, 5 the case law requires it in order to “negative the defendant’s right to break and enter, and to protect him from a second prosecution for the same offense.” Cady v. United States, 54 App. D.C. 10, 13 , 293 F. 829, 832 (1923); accord, Bord v. United States, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 205, 206 , 133 F.2d 313, 314 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 671 , 63 S.Ct. 77 , 87 L.Ed. 539 (1942).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dill Manufacturing Co.
v.
Goff
No. 370.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 26, 1942.
317 U.S. 672
Messrs. Arthur J. Hudson and W. E. Williams for petitioner. Mr. Albert L. Ely for respondents.
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.