green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1950 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1950
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Wisconsin Senate v. Thompson
(2×)
See Blanch v. Cordero, 180 F.2d 56 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 340 U.S. 819 , 71 S. Ct. 49 , 95 L.Ed 601 (1950); Fitzsimmons v. Leon, 141 F.2d 886 (1st Cir. 1944) (Organic Act of Puerto Rico empowers governor to scale down as well as to disprove items in *459 appropriation bills since governor may object to an item, part, or portion thereof) .... "...
cited
Cited "see"
Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. v. United States
See Falwell v. United States, 69 F.Supp. 71, 77 (W.D.Va.1946), aff'd, 340 U.S. 807 , 67 S.Ct. 1087 , 91 L.Ed. 1264 (1947).
cited
Cited "see"
Hudson Transit Lines, Inc., Hudson Transit Corp. v. United States of America, Interstate Commerce Commission and Pine Hill-Kingston Bus Corp., Hudson Transit Lines, Inc., Hudson Transit Corp. v. United States of America, Interstate Commerce Commission and Adirondack Transit Lines, Inc., American Bus Association, Intervenor. State of New Jersey, Dept. Of Transportation v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America
See Falwell v. United States, 69 F.Supp. 71, 77 (W.D.Va.1946), aff'd, 340 U.S. 807 , 67 S.Ct. 1087 , 91 L.Ed. 1264 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see"
Karcher v. Kean
See Blanch v. Cordero, 180 F. 2d 856 (1st Cir.1950), cert. den. 340 U.S. 819 , 71 S.Ct. 49 , 95 L.Ed. 601 (1950); Fitzsimmons v. Leon, 141 A. 2d 886 (1st Cir.1944) (Organic Act of Puerto Rico empowers governor to scale down as well as to disapprove items in appropriation bills since governor may object to an item, part, or portion thereof).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference
See dissenting opinion in Alberty v. Federal Trade Comm., 86 U.S.App.D.C. 238, 242 , 182 F.2d 36, 40 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 818 , 71 S.Ct. 49 , 95 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Warner-Lambert Company v. Federal Trade Commission
(2×)
Compare Alberty v. FTC, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 238 , 182 F.2d 36 , cert. denied, 340 U.S. 818 , 71 S.Ct. 49 , 95 L.Ed. 601 (1950), discussed in note 52 infra 52 In Alberty v. FTC, supra note 51, this court set aside an order similar to the one upheld in J.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Trade Commission v. Simeon Management Corporation
Compare Alberty v. FTC, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 238 , 182 F.2d 36, 39 , cert. denied, 340 U.S. 818 , 71 S.Ct. 49 , 95 L.Ed. 601 (1950), with Brite Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keele Hair & Scalp Specialists, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
See also Mueller v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 262 F.2d 443 . 8 II. 12 Has the Commission the power to require affirmative disclosure? 13 Petitioners argue, citing Alberty v. Federal Trade Commission, 1950, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 238 , 182 F.2d 36, 43 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 818 , 71 S.Ct. 49 , 95 L.Ed. 601 , that the Commission cannot order them to disclose what their product and treatment will not do. 9 The Act states that the term "false advertising" includes "not only representations made or suggested * * * but also the extent to which the advertisement fails to reveal facts material in th…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Norton Company
v.
Department of Revenue of Illinois
v.
Department of Revenue of Illinois
No. 133.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1950.
Roland Towle for petitioner. Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General of Illinois, William C. Wines, Raymond S. Sarnow and James C. Murray, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Published
Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari granted.