green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1907 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1907
1966
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas Shea v. James Gabriel, United States Attorney
See Centracchio v. Garrity, 198 F.2d 382, 386 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 866 , 73 S.Ct. 108 , 97 L.Ed. 672 (1952).
cited
Cited "see"
Rodgers v. United States
See Centracchio v. Garrity, 1 Cir., 1952, 198 F.2d 382, 389 , certiorari denied 344 U.S. 866 , 73 S.Ct. 108 , 97 L.Ed. 672 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Moyer v. Brownell
See Centracchio v. Garrity, 1 Cir., 1952, 198 F.2d 382 , 386 & 388, certiorari denied 344 U.S. 866 , 73 S.Ct. 108 , 97 L.Ed. 672 , and cases there cited; cf. Lapides v. United States, 2 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 253 . 13 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Ninety-One Thousand Dollars in United States Currency
Compare, e.g., Centracchio v. Garr *428 ity, 198 F.2d 382, 385-86 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 866 , 73 S.Ct. 108 , 97 L.Ed. 672 (1952) (petitioner’s independent proceeding for return of property allegedly obtained by unconstitutional search and seizure, properly addressed to inherent power of the court to discipline its officers and properly entertained even prior to indictment, dismissed as lacking in equity) with Shea v. Gabriel, 520 F.2d 879 (1st Cir.1975) (petitioner who sought pre-indictment return of allegedly illegally seized currency, by filing both complaint invoking federal …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles W. Hoffritz v. United States of America, Laughlin E. Waters, United States Attorney, and Irwin R. Weiss
(2×)
See, also, Centracchio v. Garrity, 1 Cir., 198 F.2d 382 , certiorari denied 344 U.S. 866 , 73 S.Ct. 108 , 97 L.Ed. 672 . 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. The Shotwell Manufacturing Company, United States of America v. Byron A. Cain, United States of America v. Frank J. Huebner, United States of America v. Harold E. Sullivan
Compare Centracchio v. Garrity, 1 Cir., 198 F.2d 382, 388 , certiorari denied 344 U.S. 866 , 73 S.Ct. 108 , 97 L.Ed. 672 , with In re Liebster, D.C., 91 F.Supp. 814 . 69 Reverting to the legal question of interpretation of the policy statements, it seems to me the majority opinion turns on an assumption that any action by a taxpayer which advises a Treasury official that a tax return previously filed by him is incorrect or incomplete is a sufficient disclosure.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shotwell Manufacturing Co.
Compare Centrac-chio v. Garrity, 1 Cir., 198 F.2d 382, 388 , certiorari denied 344 U.S. 866 , 73 S.Ct. 108 , 97 L.Ed. 672 , with In re Liebster, D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Centracchio
v.
Garrity, U. S. Attorney
v.
Garrity, U. S. Attorney
No. 328.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 27, 1952.
Bolling R. Powell, Jr. for petitioner., Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Lyon, Ellis N. Slack and John Lockley for respondent.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published
[*866] C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.