Peairs v. Texas, 350 U.S. 858 (1955). · Go Syfert
Search
Peairs v. Texas, 350 U.S. 858 (1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. Bradley (pa, 1982-12-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. Bradley
Pa. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Smith’s Case, 381 Pa. 223 , 112 A.2d 625 , appeal dismissed, 350 U.S. 858 , 76 S.Ct. 105 , 100 L.Ed. 762 (1955).
discussed Cited "see" Weber v. Lynch (2×)
Pa. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith Case, 381 Pa. 223 , 112 A.2d 625 , 55 A.L.R.2d 420 (1955), appeal dismissed 350 U.S. 858 , 76 S.Ct. 105 , 100 L.Ed. 762 (1955); Klugman v. Gimbel Bros., Inc., 198 Pa.Super. 268 , 182 A.2d 223 (1962).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Peairs
v.
Texas
No. 284.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1955.
350 U.S. 858
Charles W. Tessmer for appellant. John Ben Shepperd, Attorney General of Texas, and Katherine W. Conti, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Published

Appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.