Akron, Canton & Youngstown R.R. v. Frozen Food Express, 355 U.S. 6 (1957). · Go Syfert
Search
Akron, Canton & Youngstown R.R. v. Frozen Food Express, 355 U.S. 6 (1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases · "creditor"
30 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Richard Suarez (ca11, 1987-07-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Richard Suarez
11th Cir. · 1987 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a waiver at one stage of a trial should be final for all further stages ...
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) California v. Automobile Manufacturers Ass'n
9th Cir. · 1973 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
creditor
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In Re Multidistrict Vehicle Air Pollution M.D.L. No. 31. State of California v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., Robert Morgan v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City of Philadelphia v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., State of New York v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City of New York v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City and County of Denver v. American Motors Corporation
9th Cir. · 1973 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
creditor
cited Cited as authority (rule) Byrd v. North State Motor Lines, Inc.
N.C. · 1965 · confidence medium
Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. *375 R. v. Frozen Food Express, 355 U.S. 6 , 78 S. Ct. 38, 40, 42 , 2 L.
discussed Cited "see" CP Kelco U.S. Inc. v. Pharmacia Corp.
D. Del. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Krasnov, 143 F.Supp. 184, 191 (E.D.Pa. 1956)(“The privilege once waived cannot be regained.”), aff'd sub nom., Oppenheimer v. United States, 355 U.S. 5 , 78 S.Ct. 38 , 2 L.Ed.2d 22 (1957); cf., Rogers v. United States, 340 U.S. 367, 371 , 71 S.Ct. 438 , 95 L.Ed. 344 (1951) (discussing 5th Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, the Supreme Court noted that, having waived the privilege, one cannot later assert it: “To uphold a claim of privilege in this case would open the way to distortion of facts by permitting a witness to select any stopping place in the t…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AKRON, CANTON & YOUNGSTOWN RAILROAD CO.
v.
FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS
No. 258.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1957.
355 U.S. 6
Carl Helmetag, Jr. and Charles P. Reynolds for appellants in No. 258., Rollo E. Kidwell and Peter T. Beardsley for appellant in No. 263., Robert W. Cinnane and Charlie H. Johns, Jr. for appellant in No. 270., Carl L. Phinney for the Frozen Food Express, appellee.
Are, Frankfurter, Noted, Should.
Cited by 20 opinions  |  Published
2 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 76%
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2) · Eleventh Circuit (1)
Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.