Williams v. Lee, 356 U.S. 930 (1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Williams v. Lee, 356 U.S. 930 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: David Stirling, Jr., and William G. Stirling v. Chemical Bank, Individually, and as Agent, David Stirling, Jr., and William G. Stirling v. Union Planters National Bank of Memphis (ca2, 1975-02-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" David Stirling, Jr., and William G. Stirling v. Chemical Bank, Individually, and as Agent, David Stirling, Jr., and William G. Stirling v. Union Planters National Bank of Memphis
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Edwards v. Doctors Hospital Inc., 242 F.2d 888, 891 (2d Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 930 , 78 S.Ct. 770 , 2 L.Ed.2d 761 (1958). 1 Here, however, the filing of the notice of appeal within 60 days, coupled with a prima facie showing of excusable neglect, and the timely service of the notice of appeal on the opposing parties, constituted a sufficient manifestation on the part of the appellants to permit the district court, in the exercise of its discretion, to treat the notice of appeal as the substantial equivalent of a motion to extend the time because of excusable neglect.
discussed Cited "see" Stirling v. Chemical Bank
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Edwards v. Doctors Hospital Inc., 242 F.2d 888, 891 (2d Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 930 , 78 S.Ct. 770 , 2 L.Ed.2d 761 (1958). 1 Here, however, the filing of the notice of appeal within 60 days, coupled with a prima facie showing of excusable neglect, and the timely service of the notice of appeal on the opposing parties, constituted a sufficient manifestation on the part of the appellants to permit the district court, in the exercise of its discretion, to treat the notice of appeal as the substantial equivalent of a motion to extend the time because of excusable neglect.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams et ux.
v.
Lee, doing business as Ganado Trading Post
No. 811.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 14, 1958.
356 U.S. 930
Norman M. Littell, Frederick Bernays Wiener and Laurence Davis for petitioners.
Published

Supreme Court of Arizona. Certiorari granted. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief setting forth the views of the United States.