green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Celotex Corp.
See Saper v. West, 263 F.2d 422 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 916 , 79 S.Ct. 1433 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1532 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Clarkson Company Limited, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, Etc. v. John M. Shaheen, Roy M. Furmark, Albin W. Smith, Peter L. Caras, Paul W. Rishell, Shaheen Natural Resources Company, Inc., Newfoundland Refining Company, Ltd., U.S.A., and Founders Corporation, the Clarkson Company Limited, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, Etc. v. Shaheen Natural Resources Company, Inc., John M. Shaheen, MacMillan Ring-Free Oil Co., Inc., and Ian W. Outerbridge, and Global Forwarding, Inc., Skidmore & Mason, Inc., Bona Vista Food Services, Ltd. And United Airlines, Inc., Additional
Accord, Saper v. West, 263 F.2d 422, 427 (2d Cir.) (creditor could not attach fund held in custody of court since debtor retained only a reversionary interest in the fund contingent upon the "highly remote possibility that the trial court's judgment would be reversed on appeal"), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 916 , 79 S.Ct. 1433 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1532 (1959); see also Mid-Jersey National Bank v. Fidelity Mortgage Investors, 518 F.2d 640, 644 (3d Cir.1975) (citing Saper v. West with approval and holding that only the defendant's "contingent reversionary interest" in funds held in trust by court for benefit …
discussed
Cited "see"
Clarkson Co. v. Shaheen
Accord, Saper v. West, 263 F.2d 422, 427 (2d Cir.) (creditor could not attach fund held in custody of court since debtor retained only a reversionary interest in the fund contingent upon the “highly remote possibility that the trial court’s judgment would be reversed on appeal”), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 916 , 79 S.Ct. 1433 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1532 (1959); see also Mid-Jersey National Bank v. Fidelity Mortgage Investors, 518 F.2d 640, 644 (3d Cir.1975) (citing Saper v. West with approval and holding that only the defendant’s “contingent reversionary interest” in funds held in trust by court …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thompson
v.
City of Louisville
v.
City of Louisville
No. 884.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1959.
Louis Lusky, Harold Leventhal and Eugene Gressman for petitioner. Jo M. Ferguson, Attorney. General of Kentucky, Wm. E. Allender, Assistant Attorney General, 'William E. Berry and Herman E. Frick for respondents.
Published
Police Court of Louisville, Kentucky. Certiorari granted.