green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. 9.85 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.
United States v. 29.40 Acres of Land, D.C.D.N.J., 131 F. Supp. 84 ; United States v. 44.00 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 234 F.2d 410 , certiorari denied 352 U.S. 916 , 77 S.Ct. 215 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 123 ; but see In re United States, 5 Cir., 257 F.2d 844 , certiorari denied Certain Interests in Property in Hillsborough County of Florida v. United States, 358 U.S. 908 , 79 S.Ct. 234 , 3 L.Ed.2d 228 .
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc.
Rougeau, 432 So.2d at 1167 ; see Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 908 , 79 S.Ct. 234 , 3 L.Ed.2d 229 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Sylvia Development Corp. v. Calvert County
See Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 908 , 79 S.Ct. 234 , 3 L.Ed.2d 229 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Sylvia Development Corporation v. Calvert County
See Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 908 , 79 S.Ct. 234 , 3 L.Ed.2d 229 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
Menne v. Celotex Corporation
See Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1163 (4th Cir.1986) ("permissible inferences must ... be within the range of reasonable probability") (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 908 , 79 S.Ct. 234 , 3 L.Ed.2d 229 (1958)); Lisa-Jet, Inc. v. Duncan Aviation, Inc., 569 F.2d 1044 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 828 , 99 S.Ct. 100 , 58 L.Ed.2d 121 (1978) (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. Mondragon, 271 F.2d 342, 345 (8th Cir.1959), that "[t]he essential inference cannot be left to conjecture and speculation").
discussed
Cited "see"
Menne v. Celotex Corp.
See Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1163 (4th Cir.1986) (“permissible inferences must ... be within the range of reasonable probability”) (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 908 , 79 S.Ct. 234 , 3 L.Ed.2d 229 (1958)); Lisa-Jet, Inc. v. Duncan Aviation, Inc., 569 F.2d 1044 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 828 , 99 S.Ct. 100 , 58 L.Ed.2d 121 (1978) (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. Mondragon, 271 F.2d 342, 345 (8th Cir.1959), that “[t]he essential inference cannot be left to conjecture and speculation”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert J. Mayberry v. William Dees, Chairman, Board of Governors, University of North Carolina, Individually and in His Official Capacity, William Friday, President,university of North Carolina, Individually and in His Official Capacity Robertmorgan, Chairman,board of Trustees, East Carolina University, Individually and in His Officialcapacity Leo W. Jenkins, Chancellor, East Carolina University, Individuallyand in His Official Capacity Robert L. Holt, Vice-Chancellor, East Carolinauniversity,individually and in His Official Capacity Robert W. Williams, Provost, Eastcarolina University, Individually and in His Official Capacity Richardcapwell, Dean Arts and Sciences East Carolina University, Individually and Inhis Official Capacityjoseph Fernandez, Chairman of Romance Languages, East Carolina University,individually and in His Official Capacity, National Education Association, Amicus Curiae. Robert J. Mayberry v. William Dees, Chairman, Board of Governors, University of North Carolina, Individually and in His Official Capacity William Friday, President,university of North Carolina, Individually and in His Official Capacity Robertmorgan, Chairman,board of Trustees, East Carolina University, Individually and in His Officialcapacity Leo W. Jenkins, Chancellor, East Carolina University, Individuallyand in His Official Capacity Robert L. Holt, Vice-Chancellor, East Carolinauniversity,individually and in His Official Capacity Robert W. Williams, Provost, Eastcarolina University, Individually and in His Official Capacity Richardcapwell, Dean, Arts and Sciences, East Carolina University, Individually and Inhis Officialcapacity Joseph Fernandez, Chairman of Romance Languages, East Carolinauniversity, Individually and in His Official Capacity, National Education Association, Amicus Curiae
Chief Judge Sobeloff put it well when he observed that an issue can only be submitted to the jury when it is supported by "(e)vidence which shows a 'probability' and not a mere 'possibility.' " Ralston Purina Co. v. Edmunds, 241 F.2d 164, 168 (4th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 974 , 77 S.Ct. 1059 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1136 (1957); accord Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 908 , 79 S.Ct. 234 , 3 L.Ed.2d 229 (1958); Bryan v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., 565 F.2d 276, 281-82 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 1524…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mayberry v. Dees
Chief Judge Sobeloff put it well when he observed that an issue can only be submitted to the jury when it is supported by “[e]vidence which shows a ‘probability’ and not a mere ‘possibility.’ ” Ralston Purina Co. v. Edmunds, 241 F.2d 164, 168 (4th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 974 , 77 S.Ct. 1059 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1136 (1957); accord Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 908 , 79 S.Ct. 234 , 3 L.Ed.2d 229 (1958); Bryan v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., 565 F.2d 276, 281-82 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 943 , 9…
cited
Cited "see"
T. B. Wingo v. United States
See Ingram v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 259 F.2d 886 , certiorari granted, and now pending, 358 U.S. 905 , 79 S.Ct. 234 , 3 L.Ed.2d 227 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frankel v. Slotkin
But the inference, to qualify as a fact found, must be reasonable, and, in the context of the known facts, be one that springs readily and logically to mind and is not one of two or more inferences, both or all of which are about equally probable. 29 NLRB v. Martin A. Gleason, Inc., 534 F.2d 466 , 474 (2d Cir.1976); see also Radiation Dynamics, Inc. v. Goldmuntz, 464 F.2d 876, 887 (2d Cir.1972) (" '[p]ermissible inferences must still be within the range of reasonable probability ... and it is the duty of the court to withdraw the case from the jury when the necessary inference is so tenuous th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frankel v. Slotkin
NLRB v. Martin A. Gleason, Inc., 534 F.2d 466 , 474 (2d Cir.1976); see also Radiation Dynamics, Inc. v. Goldmuntz, 464 F.2d 876, 887 (2d Cir.1972) (“ ‘[permissible inferences must still be within the range of reasonable probability ... and it is the duty of the court to withdraw the case from the jury when the necessary inference is so tenuous that it rests merely upon speculation and conjecture’ ” (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 908 , 79 S.Ct. 234 , 3 L.Ed.2d 229 (1958))).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clarence Evans and Katherine Evans v. United States of America, Chester Parker v. United States
See, also, In re Unit *830 ed States, 5 Cir., 1958, 257 F.2d 844, 849 , certiorari denied, Certain Interests in Property, etc. v. United States, 358 U.S. 908 , 79 S.Ct. 234 , 3 L.Ed.2d 228 ; United States v. 9.85 Acres in Hampton, Virginia, E.D.Va., 1959, 183 F.Supp. 402, 404-405 , affirmed sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McDavid
v.
Ford Motor Co.
v.
Ford Motor Co.
No. 460.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 1958.
C. T. Graydon for petitioner. Nathaniel A. Turner for respondent.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.