green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Monsanto Co. v. Campuzano
See id. (citing Wolfe v. National Lead Co., 272 F.2d 867 (9th Cir.1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 950 , 80 S.Ct. 860 , 4 L.Ed.2d 868 (1960), overrun in part on other grounds, Maier Brewing Co. v. Fleischmann Distilling Corp., 359 F.2d 156, 165 (9th Cir.1966) and noting Wolfe was cited with approval by the Eleventh Circuit in John H.
discussed
Cited "see"
American Express Co. v. American Express Limousine Service Ltd.
See Wolfe v. Nat’l Lead Co., 272 F.2d 867 , 873 (9th Cir.1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 950 , 80 S.Ct. 860 , 4 L.Ed.2d 868 (1960); Durbin Brass Works, Inc. v. Schuler, 532 F.Supp. 41, 44 (E.D.Mo.1982); Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Sanders, 108 F.Supp. 674, 678-79 (E.D.N.Y.1952), aff'd, 204 F.2d 125 (2d Cir.1953).
cited
Cited "see"
Alpo Petfoods, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.
See Wolfe v. National Lead Co., 272 F.2d 867 (9th Cir.1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 950 , 80 S.Ct. 860 , 4 L.Ed.2d 868 , rehearing denied, 363 U.S. 809 , 80 S.Ct. 1235 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1151 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
John T. Witherow v. The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, a Corporation
See Iovino v. Waterson, 274 F.2d 41 , 48 n.5 (2d Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 949 , 80 S.Ct. 860 , 4 L.Ed.2d 867 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Stein v. Willingham
See Stein v. United States, 271 F.2d 895 (9th Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 950 , 80 S.Ct. 860 , 4 L.Ed.2d 868 . [Petition, ¶[¶[ 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8].
discussed
Cited "see"
Jaftex Corporation, Third-Party v. Randolph Mills, Inc., Third-Party Gail Shawe, an Infant, by Annette Shawe and Earle K. Shawe, and Early K. Shawe v. Wendy Wilson, Inc., a Division of Lewis Frimel Co., and Jaftex Corporation
See Iovino v. Waterson, supra, 2 Cir., 274 F.2d 41, 48 , certiorari denied Carlin v. Iovino, 362 U.S. 949 , 80 S.Ct. 860 , 4 L.Ed.2d 867 , upholding F.R. 25(a)(1) (substitution of parties), and D'Onofrio Const. Co. v. Recon Co., 1 Cir., 255 F.2d 904, 910 , upholding F.R. 14 (impleader), in diversity cases. 10 Actually, however, it runs counter to the rationale of Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, 350 U.S. 198, 202-203, 205-212 , 76 S.Ct. 273 , 100 L.Ed. 199 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Jaftex Corp. v. Randolph Mills, Inc.
See Iovino v. Waterson, supra, 2 Cir., 274 F.2d 41, 48 , certiorari denied Carlin v. Iovino, 362 U.S. 949 , 80 S.Ct. 860 , 4 L.Ed.2d 867 , upholding F.R. 25(a) (1) (substitution of parties), and D’Onofrio Const. Co. v. Recon Co., 1 Cir., 255 F.2d 904, 910 , upholding F.R. 14 (impleader), in diversity cases. 10 Actually, however, it runs counter to the rationale of Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, 350 U.S. 198, 202-203, 205-212 , 76 S.Ct. 273 , 100 L.Ed. 199 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kicak
v.
Ohio
v.
Ohio
No. 730.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1960.
Petitioner pro se., Thomas Beil for respondent.
Published
Supreme Court of Ohio. Certiorari denied.