green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ralls v. Manson
See United States v. Curcio, 279 F.2d 681 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 364 U.S. 824 , 81 S.Ct. 59 , 5 L.Ed.2d 52 (1960); United States v. Thomas, 282 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1960); United States v. Tolub, 309 F.2d 286 (2d Cir. 1962); United States v. Kahaner, 317 F.2d 459, 483-484 (2d Cir.), cert. denied Corallo v. United States, 375 U.S. 835 , 84 S.Ct. 62 , 11 L.Ed.2d 65 (1963); United States v. Kenner, supra, 354 F.2d at 782-783 ; United States v. Bilotti, 380 F.2d 649, 654 (2d Cir.) cert. denied 389 U.S. 944 , 88 S.Ct. 308 , 19 L.Ed.2d 300 (1967); United States v. Meyers, 410 F.2d 693, 697 (2d Cir.), …
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Herhal
See United States v. Joseph, 174 F.Supp. 539 (E.D.Pa.1959), aff’d. 278 F.2d 504 , cert. denied 364 U.S. 823 , 81 S.Ct. 59 , 5 L.Ed.2d 52 (1960) and United States v. Bell, 126 F.Supp. 612 (D.C.D.C.1955), aff’d. 99 U.S.App.D.C. 351 , 240 F.2d 37 (1956).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. One 1962 Cadillac, Four Door Sedan Automobile, Motor No. 62b 025470 Frank J. Daniello
See United States v. Joseph, 174 F.Supp. *798 539, 543 (E.D.Pa.1959), affd. 278 F.2d 504 (3 Cir. 1960), cert. den. 364 U.S. 823 , 81 S.Ct. 59 , 5 L.Ed.2d 52 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anne Lamont
See e. g., United States v. Reed, 526 F.2d 740, 743 (CA 2 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 , 96 S.Ct. 1431 , 47 L.Ed.2d 361 (1976), and United States v. Curcio, 279 F.2d 681, 682 (CA 2), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 824 , 81 S.Ct. 59 , 5 L.Ed.2d 52 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lupo v. Consolidated Mariners, Inc.
See Roper v. United States, 368 U.S. 20, 21 , 82 S.Ct. 5 , 7 L.Ed.2d 1 (1961); Butler v. Whiteman, 356 U.S. 271, 272 , 78 S.Ct. 734 , 2 L.Ed.2d 754 (1958) (Dissenting opinion, per Mr. Justice Harlan); cf., Hawn v. American S. S. Co., 107 F. 2d 999, 1000 (2d Cir. 1939); see also Pederson v. The Bulklube, 170 F.Supp. 462, 464 (E.D.N.Y.1959), aff’d on the opinion below, 274 F.2d 824 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 814 , 81 S.Ct. 44 , 5 L.Ed.2d 46 (1960).
Moses Lake Homes, Inc.
v.
Grant County
v.
Grant County
No. 212.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1960.
Lyle L. Iverson for petitioners.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Question No. 3 presented by the petition which reads as follows:
“3. May a state tax which discriminates against persons holding leaseholds from the United States be enforced in a United States court against a deposit of estimated compensation in a condemnation of such leasehold?”
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case setting forth the views of the United States.