Spencer v. Hibernia Bank, 368 U.S. 2 (1961). · Go Syfert
Spencer v. Hibernia Bank, 368 U.S. 2 (1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Immanuel Christian Price v. C and PR Harris (cacd, 2020-05-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961 1993 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Immanuel Christian Price v. C and PR Harris
C.D. Cal. · 2020 · confidence medium
Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 , 82 S. Ct. 15 1386, 8 L.
examined Cited as authority (rule) Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Energy Gathering, Inc. (4×) also: Cited "see"
5th Cir. · 1993 · confidence medium
Co., 82 S.Ct. 15 1386, 1389 (1962).
discussed Cited "see" Greg Malone Gene Malone v. Bureau of Indian Affairs
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Milk Transp., Inc. v. I.C.C., 190 F.Supp. 350, 355 (D.Minn.1960), aff'd per curiam, 368 U.S. 5 , 82 S.Ct. 15 , 7 L.Ed.2d 16 (1961); cf. Department of the Treasury v. Federal Labor Relations Auth., 494 U.S. 922, 933 , 110 S.Ct. 1623, 1629-30 , 108 L.Ed.2d 914 (1990) (refusing to consider a proposed interpretation when the agency did not consider the issue because doing so would usurp the agency’s authority to “give reasonable content to the statute’s textual ambiguities”).
discussed Cited "see" Puerto Rico Higher Education Assistance Corporation v. Richard W. Riley, Secretary of the Department of Education (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Milk Transport, Inc. v. ICC, 190 F.Supp. 350 (D.Minn.1960), aff'd per curiam 368 U.S. 5 , 82 S.Ct. 15 , 7 L.Ed.2d 16 (1961).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SPENCER, ADMINISTRATRIX, Et Al.
v.
HIBERNIA BANK Et Al.
176.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1961.
368 U.S. 2
M. Mitchell Bourquin and George Olshausen for appellants., Moses Lasky and James Farraher for appellees.
Per Curiam.
Published
Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.