green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
T.A.M., Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp.
But see Susser v. Carvel Corporation, 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir.1964), ce rt. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1964) (refusing to treat franchise system and trademark as “tying” products); Reed v. Shell Oil Co., 524 F.2d 1054 (10th Cir.1975) (Shell trademark “cannot be considered as a ‘product’ ”).
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Lawn King, Inc.
(2×)
Id. at 6, 78 S.Ct. at 518, 2 L.Ed.2d at 550; but see Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505, 518 (2 Cir. 1964), cert. dism. 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965).
discussed
Cited "but see"
David Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc. And Quincy Adams Donuts, Inc. C/o C.T. Corporation, in No. 75--1625. John Rader, an Individual v. Dunkin' Donuts, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc., a Massachusetts Corporation, in No. 75--1626
But see, Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965) (refusing to treat a franchise system as involving a single unified product).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc.
But see, Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965) (refusing to treat a franchise system as involving a single unified product).
discussed
Cited "see"
Instructional Systems, Inc. v. Computer Curriculum Corp.
(2×)
See Susser v. Carvel Corporation, 206 F.Supp. 636, 640 (S.D.N.Y.1962), aff’d 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir.1964), app. dism. 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965) in which the court explained that * * * the cornerstone of a franchise system must be the trademark or trade name of a product.
cited
Cited "see"
Kellam Energy, Inc. v. Duncan
See Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505, 520 (2d Cir.1964), *881 ce rt. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Neptune T.V. & Appliance Service, Inc. v. Litton Microwave Cooking Products Division, Litton Systems, Inc.
See Susser v. Carvel Corporation, 206 F.Supp. 636, 640 (S.D.N.Y.1962), aff’d 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir.1964), app. dism. 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965), in which the court explained that * * * the cornerstone of a franchise system must be the trademark or trade name of a product.
discussed
Cited "see"
Neptune TV & App. v. LITTON MICROWAVE, ETC.
See Susser v. Carvel Corporation, 206 F. Supp. 636, 640 (S.D.N.Y. 1962), aff'd 332 F. 2d 505 (2d Cir.1964), app. dism. 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed. 2d 284 (1965), in which the court explained that * * * the cornerstone of a franchise system must be the trademark or trade name of a product.
discussed
Cited "see"
James E. Northern and Shirley Northern v. McGraw Company, Betty Soper and Jeffson Industries, Inc., Intervenors-Appellees
Warriner Hermetics, Inc. v. Copeland Refrigeration Corp., 463 F.2d 1002, 1012-1016 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1086 , 93 S.Ct. 688 , 34 L.Ed.2d 673 (1972); Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 47-49 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972); see Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Finlay & Associates, Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corp.
See Susser v. Carvel Corp., 206 F. Supp. 636 (S.D.N.Y. 1962), aff'd 332 F. 2d 505 (2 Cir.1964), cert. granted, but later dismissed at 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed. 2d 284 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matarazzo v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.
See Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir.), cert. granted, 379 U.S. 885 , 85 S.Ct. 158 , 13 L.Ed.2d 91 (1964), cert, dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965); 84 Harv.L.Rev. 1717, 1722 & n. 24 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Evans v. SS Kresge Company
See Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505, 518 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.
See Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965) ; McElhenney Co. v. Western Auto Supply Co., 269 F.2d 332 (4th Cir. 1959).
cited
Cited "see"
NW Controls, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corporation
See Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505, 514 (C.A.2, 1964), cert. dis. 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965). 6.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Uniroyal, Inc.
See, Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Corbett v. Stergios
See comment under 1, supra. 6) In Greece the adoptive parent need not see the child before it is adopted.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
KFC Corp. v. Marion-Kay Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Susser v. Carvel Corporation, 332 F.2d 505, 517 (2d Cir.), cert. granted 379 U.S. 885 , 85 S.Ct. 158 , 13 L.Ed.2d 91 (1964) and cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Data General Corp. Antitrust Litigation
See, e. g., Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505, 520 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965); Baker v. Simmons Co., 307 F.2d 458 (1st Cir. 1962); United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Pa.1960), aff’d per curiam, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abraham Grunin v. International House of Pancakes, a Division of International Industries, Inc., Shapiro, Posell & Pilling and Mitchell S. Shapiro v. International House of Pancakes, a Division of International Industries, Inc., Mark J. Klein v. International House of Pancakes, a Division of International Industries, Inc., David Berger, P. A., Cross-Appellant v. Mark J. Klein, Cross-Appellee
See also Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505, 516-17 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965). 28 In addition, appellees here contend that because the lease of equipment was not made a prerequisite to acquiring a franchise, the absence of coercion makes the Chicken Delight rationale inapposite.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Grunin v. International House of Pancakes
See also Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505, 516-17 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CORBETT, GUARDIAN
v.
STERGIOS, AKA STERYIAKIS
v.
STERGIOS, AKA STERYIAKIS
179.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 3, 1965.
Robert. R. Eidsmoe argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was George S. Porikos., Phillip S. Dandos argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief was Harry H. Smith.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Per Curiam.
In light of our construction of the Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation between the United States and the Kingdom of Greece, signed August 3, 1951, effective October 13, 1954, * a construction confirmed by representations of the signatories whose views were not available to the Supreme Court of Iowa, the judgment is reversed. Clark v. Allen, 331 U. S. 503.
*
5 TJ. S. Treaties and Other International Agreements 1829; T. I. A. S. No. 3057.