green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Willis v. Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc.
Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox, 379 U.S. 3 650, 85 S.Ct. 614 , 13 L.Ed.2d 580 (1965) (substantive federal law applies to suits on collective bargaining agreements covered by this section [§ 185].) However, the court below applied state law to the claims in its Memorandum Opinion granting summary judgment to Roche.
cited
Cited "see"
Senior Citizens Stores, Inc. v. United States
See People’s Educational Camp Society, Inc. v. Commissioner, 331 F.2d 923, 931-932 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 839 , 85 S.Ct. 75 , 13 L.Ed.2d 45 (1964).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Roden
See, e.g., United States v. Pasha, 332 F.2d 193, 198 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 839 , 85 S. Ct. 75 , 13 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Roden
See, e.g., United States v. Pasha, 332 F.2d 193, 198 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 839 , 85 S. Ct. 75 , 13 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ben Lee Basey, Armando Jose Lopez, and Oscar Quirarte Ponce, Defendants
(2×)
See also United States v. Pasha, 332 F.2d 193, 197-98 (7th Cir.) (holding that revenue agents' impersonation of defendants for whom calls the agents answered were intended did not constitute interception of wire communications), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 839 , 85 S.Ct. 75 , 13 L.Ed.2d 45 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Isreal Wilson A/K/A Junior Wilson A/K/A Big Man, United States of America v. Boyd Griffin Gray A/K/A Punkin, United States of America v. Brenda Ann Brown A/K/A Brenda Paige
See also United States v. Pasha, 332 F.2d 193, 196-97 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 839 , 85 S.Ct. 75 , 13 L.Ed.2d 45 (1964); Armstrong v. United States, 327 F.2d 189, 197 (9th Cir. 1964); Reynolds v. United States, 225 F.2d 123, 131-32 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 914 , 76 S.Ct. 197 , 100 L.Ed. 801 (1955). 38 Furthermore, as the government contended at trial, 6 the books, the entries made and the codes used were as described previously by the informant.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wilson
See also United States v. Pasha, 332 F.2d 193, 196-97 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 839 , 85 S.Ct. 75 , 13 L.Ed.2d 45 (1964); Armstrong v. United States, 327 F.2d 189, 197 (9th Cir. 1964); Reynolds v. United States, 225 F.2d 123, 131-32 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 914 , 76 S.Ct. 197 , 100 L.Ed. 801 (1955).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Santa Cruz Building Ass'n v. United States
See also People's Educational Camp Society, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 331 F.2d 923, 929 (2nd Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 839 , 85 S.Ct. 75 , 13 L.Ed.2d 45 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Commonwealth
(2×)
Bargain City U.S.A. v. Dilworth, 407 Pa. 129, 131-33 , 179 A.2d 439, 441-42 (1962); compare Milk Control Commission v. Battista, 413 Pa. 652 , 198 A.2d 840 , appeal dismissed, 379 U.S. 3 , 85 S.Ct. 75 , 13 L.Ed.2d 22 (1964), with Williamson v. Lee Optical, Inc., 348 U.S. 483 , 75 S.Ct. 461 , 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955); see also Tosto v. Pennsylvania Nursing Home Loan Agency, 460 Pa. 1, 13 , 331 A.2d 198, 204 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baltimore & OR Co. v. CMWLTH., D. OF L. & I.
(2×)
Bargain City U.S.A. v. Dilworth, 407 Pa. 129, 131-33 , 179 A.2d 439, 441-42 (1962); compare Milk Control Commission v. Battista, 413 Pa. 652 , 198 A.2d 840 , appeal dismissed, 379 U.S. 3 , 85 S.Ct. 75 , 13 L.Ed.2d 22 (1964), with Williamson v. Lee Optical, Inc., 348 U.S. 483 , 75 S.Ct. 461 , 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955); see also Tosto v. Pennsylvania Nursing Home Loan Agency, 460 Pa. 1, 13 , 331 A.2d 198, 204 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BATTISTA ET AL., TRADING AS NOR-VIEW FARM
v.
MILK CONTROL COMMISSION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
v.
MILK CONTROL COMMISSION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
295.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1964.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
Frederick A. Ballard for appellants.
Walter E. Alessandroni, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Anthony W. Novasitis, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.