Wells v. Reynolds, 382 U.S. 39 (1965). · Go Syfert
Wells v. Reynolds, 382 U.S. 39 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Federal Trade Commission, U.S. Roofing Corporation, Intervenor-Appellant v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (ca6, 1988-08-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Federal Trade Commission, U.S. Roofing Corporation, Intervenor-Appellant v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
6th Cir. · 1988 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the government is the sole proper party to seek enforcement of government antitrust decrees.
discussed Cited "see" Spangler v. Pasadena City Board Of Education
9th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, 341 F.2d 1003, 1008 (2d Cir.), appeal dismissed, 382 U.S. 38 , 86 S.Ct. 160 , 15 L.Ed.2d 32 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 877 , 86 S.Ct. 160 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965) (indirect benefit insufficient).
discussed Cited "see" Spangler ex rel. Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education
9th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, 341 F.2d 1003, 1008 (2d Cir.), appeal dismissed, 382 U.S. 38 , 86 S.Ct. 160 , 15 L.Ed.2d 32 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 877 , 86 S.Ct. 160 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965) (indirect benefit insufficient).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Mike Honey and Martha Allen v. Jon Goodman, Shelby M. Howard, and J. W. Shines (4×)
6th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Wells v. Hand, 238 F.Supp. 779 (D.Ga.1965), aff'd per curiam, Wells v. Reynolds, 382 U.S. 39 , 86 S.Ct. 160 , 15 L.Ed.2d 32 ; Zwicker v. Boll, 270 F.Supp. 131 (D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WELLS Et Al.
v.
REYNOLDS Et Al.
258.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 18, 1965.
382 U.S. 39
Jack Greenberg and James M. Nabrit III for appellants.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 14 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2)
Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Fortas dissent.