Edwards v. Phillips, 389 U.S. 834 (1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Edwards v. Phillips, 389 U.S. 834 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
63 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 29 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Western-Realco Ltd. Partnership 1983-A v. Harrison (coloctapp, 1989-08-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Western-Realco Ltd. Partnership 1983-A v. Harrison
Colo. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 376 F.2d 675 (4th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 850 , 88 S.Ct. 38 , 19 L.Ed.2d 119 (1967).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Daniel E. Manning and David A. Wooldridge (2×)
9th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Murdock, 290 U.S. 389 , 54 S.Ct. 223 , 78 L.Ed. 381 (1933), United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corporation, 376 F.2d 675 (4th Cir.), cert. den. 389 U.S. 850 , 88 S.Ct. 38 , 19 L.Ed.2d 119 , reh. den. 389 U.S. 998 , 88 S.Ct. 458 , 19 L.Ed.2d 503 (1967). 12 The assertion that the appellants' actions were immunized by reliance on the legal advice of their alleged co-conspirator Eisenberg misreads the law in this respect.
discussed Cited "see" Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago v. The United States
Ct. Cl. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Part II, infra. All are treated on the same plane in the statute and its history. 55 For these reasons, I must conclude that, since the statutory term "exclusively for * * * charitable * * * purposes" covers a broad spectrum of projects benefiting a community and its members, 4 a bequest "for the benefit of said city of Fuerth" meets that requirement of Section 2055(a) (3). 5 II 56 The Government urges, however, that the scope of 2055(a) (3) is impliedly limited by 2055(a) (1), which allows the deduction of bequests "to or for the use of the United States, any State, Territory, any politic…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sky Way Global, LLC
M.D. Fla. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 247 F.Supp. 481, 490-95 (D.Md.1965), aff 'd 376 F.2d 675 (4th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 850 , 88 S.Ct. 38 , 19 L.Ed.2d 119 (1967) (adopting the requirement that all that is necessary “to constitute a wilful violation of § 5 of the Securities Act is intentional activity in violation of § 5 with knowledge of all the factors constituting the violation, but not proof of evil purpose” and finding that "[t]he power to punish for violation of an injunction enjoining transgression of § 5 of the Act should not be less than power to e…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edwards
v.
Phillips, District Director of Internal Revenue
No. 120.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1967.
389 U.S. 834
Barnabas F. Sears for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogo-vin and Jeanine Jacobs for respondent.
Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.