green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
6.3 score
“congress in prescribing 'equal' work did not require that the jobs be identical, but only that they must be substantially equal. any other interpretation would destroy the remedial purposes of the act.”
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lanegan-Grimm v. Library Ass'n of Portland
congress in prescribing 'equal' work did not require that the jobs be identical, but only that they must be substantially equal. any other interpretation would destroy the remedial purposes of the act.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mary P. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., Air Line Pilots Association, Non-Aligned Party. Mary P. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., Air Line Pilots Association, Non-Aligned Party
both (the civil rights act and the equal pay act) 'serve the same fundamental purpose' . . ..
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
both 'serve the same fundamental purpose' . ..
cited
Cited "see"
Hofmister v. Mississippi State Department of Health
See Odomes v. Nucare, Inc., 653 F.2d 246, 250 (6th Cir.1981), citing Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Co., 421 F.2d 259, 265 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 1696 , 26 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Grigoletti v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.
See Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Company, 421 F. 2d 259 , 266 (3d Cir.1970) cert. den. 398 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 1696 , 26 L.Ed. 2d 64 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Frankie Odomes, Cross-Appellant v. Nucare, Inc., Cross-Appellee
See Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Company, 421 F.2d 259 , 265, and n. 11 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 1696 , 26 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chenkin v. BELLEVUE HOSP. CTR., NYC, ETC.
See Thom v. New York Stock Exchange, 306 F.Supp. 1002 (S.D.N.Y.1969) aff’d sub nom Miller v. New York Stock Exchange, 425 F.2d 1074 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 1696 , 26 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970), in which this Court upheld New York State’s requirement that all employees of member firms trading on national security exchanges submit a set of their fingerprints to law enforcement authorities as a condition of employment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoppe v. Nichols
See for example Schultz [Shultz] v. Wheaton Glass Co., 421 F.2d 259 (3CA, 1970), cert. den. 398 U.S. 905 , 26 L.Ed. 2de [2d] 64, 90 S.Ct. 1696 ; Schultz [Shultz] v. American Can Co., 424 F.2d 356 (8CA, 1970); Hodgson v. Miller Brewing Co., 457 F.2d 221 (1973); Brennan v. Woodridge School District, Case No. 74-103, July 16, 1974 (D.C., Delaware, 1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Archangel Angelo v. Bacharach Instrument Company, a Division of American Bosch Arma Corporation, a New York Corporation
See Schultz v. Wheaton Glass Co., 421 F.2d 259, 265 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 398 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 1696 , 26 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hodgson v. Maison Miramon, Inc.
See Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Co., 421 F.2d 259 (C.A. 3, 1970), cert. den., 398 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 1696 , 26 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970); Shultz v. First Victoria National Bank, 420 F.2d 648 (C.A. 5, 1969). *846 The Act sets out four determinative factors to be used in deciding whether male and female employees must be paid the same wage: equal skill, responsibility, effort, and similarity of working conditions.
discussed
Cited "see"
James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Brookhaven General Hospital
(2×)
See Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Company, 3 Cir., 1970, 421 F.2d 259 , cert. denied, 398 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 1696 , 26 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970); Shultz v. First Victoria National Bank, 5 Cir., 1969, 420 F.2d 648 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Messing v. Bank of America, N.A.
See, e.g., Perkey v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 42 Cal.3d 185 , 228 Cal.Rptr. 169 , 721 P.2d 50 (1986) (state law requiring an individual to provide a fingerprint as a condition for obtaining a drivers license upheld); see also Thom v. New York Stock Exch., 306 F.Supp. 1002 (S.D.N.Y.1969), aff'd sub. nom., Miller v. New York Stock Exch., 425 F.2d 1074 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 1696 , 26 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970)(state law requiring employees in the securities industry to provide fingerprints was upheld); People v. Stuller, 10 Cal.App.3d 582 , 89 Cal.Rptr. 158 (1970)(municipal…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
F. Ray Marshall, Etc. v. St. John Valley Security Home
Compare Schultz v. Wheaton Glass Co., 421 F.2d 259 , 262 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 1696 , 26 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
W. J. Usery, Jr., Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Allegheny County Institution District D/B/A John J. Kane Hospital
See, e.g., Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Co., 421 F.2d 259, 265 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 1696 , 26 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970); Hodgson v. Fairmont Supply Co., 454 F.2d 490, 493 (4th Cir. 1972); Ammons v. Zia Co., 448 F.2d 117, 120 (10th Cir. 1971). 5 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Shudtz v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc.
See also Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Co., 421 F.2d 259, 266 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 1696 , 26 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brennan v. Owensboro-Daviess County Hospital
(2×)
See, e. g., Brennan v. Prince William Hospital Corp., 503 F.2d 282 (4th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 972 , 95 S.Ct. 1392 , 43 L.Ed.2d 652 (1975), Hodgson v. Behrens Drug Co., 475 F.2d 1041 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 822 , 94 S.Ct. 121 , 38 L.Ed.2d 55 (1973), Hodgson v. Fairmont Supply Co., 454 F.2d 490 (4th Cir. 1972), Shultz v. American Can Co.— Dixie Products, 424 F.2d 356 (8th Cir. 1970), Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Co., 421 F.2d 259 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 1696 , 26 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peter J. Brennan v. Owensboro-Daviess County Hospital
(2×)
See, e. g., Brennan v. Prince William Hospital Corp., 503 F.2d 282 (4th Cir. 1974), Cert denied, 420 U.S. 972 , 95 S.Ct. 1392 , 43 L.Ed.2d 652 (1975), Hodgson v. Behrens Drug Co., 475 F.2d 1041 (5th Cir.), Cert denied, 414 U.S. 822 , 94 S.Ct. 121 , 38 L.Ed.2d 55 (1973), Hodgson v. Fairmont Supply Co., 454 F.2d 490 (4th Cir. 1972), Shultz v. American Can Co. Dixie Products, 424 F.2d 356 (8th Cir. 1970), Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Co., 421 F.2d 259 (3d Cir.), Cert denied, 398 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 1696 , 26 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hodgson v. Miller Brewing Co.
See also Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Company, 3 Cir., 421 F.2d 259 , 265 (1970), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 1696 , 26 L.Ed.2d 64 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Miller Brewing Company, Virginia Murphy, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants v. Miller Brewing Company, Defendant-Cross-Appellee
See also Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Company, 3 Cir., 421 F.2d 259 , 265 (1970), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 1696 , 26 L.Ed.2d 64 . 21 In light of the foregoing, we conclude and hold that Miller has violated the Equal Pay Act and that its discriminatory practices did not cease with the removal of all male laboratory technicians from the Analytical Lab, or with the opening of all jobs in the Analytical Lab and MQC Lab to both men and women. 22 The next issue is whether it was proper for the district court to award liquidated damages to the three private plaintiffs.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wheaton Glass Co.
v.
Shultz, Secretary of Labor
v.
Shultz, Secretary of Labor
No. 1388.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 18, 1970.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2) · D. Oregon (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.