green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Michael T. Rose v. Department of the Air Force
(2×)
But cf. Epstein v. Resor, 421 F.2d 930, 933 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 965 , 90 S.Ct. 2176 , 26 L.Ed.2d 549 (1970) (limited role of courts under the first and third exemptions).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gosney v. Sonora Independent School District
(2×)
See, Esteban v. Central Missouri State College, 415 F.2d 1077, 1089-90 (8th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 965 , 90 S.Ct. 2169 , 26 L.Ed.2d 548 (1970) (a college has the inherent, power to promulgate rules and regulations).
examined
Cited "see"
Larry Jenkins v. Louisiana State Board of Education v. Elmer Glynn Pitre, Intervenors-Appellants
(4×)
See Esteban v. Central Missouri State College, 415 F.2d 1077, 1089 (8th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 965 , 90 S.Ct. 2169 , 26 L.Ed.2d 548 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grayned v. City of Rockford
See Esteban v. Central Missouri State College, 415 F. 2d 1077 (CA8 1969) (Blackmun, J.), cert. denied, 398 U. S. 965 (1970); Jones v. Board of Regents, 436 F. 2d 618 (CA9 1970); Hammond v. South Carolina State College, 272 F. Supp. 947 (SC 1967), cited in Tinker . [40] Cf. Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U. S., at 102 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Grayned v. City of Rockford
See Esteban v. Central Missouri State College, 415 F. 2d 1077 (CA8 1969) (Blackmun, J.), cert. denied, 398 U. S. 965 (1970); Jones v. Board of Regents, 436 F. 2d 618 (CA9 1970); Hammond v. South Carolina State College, 272 F. Supp. 947 (SC 1967), cited in Tinker .
discussed
Cited "see"
Marin Ex Rel. Meléndez v. University of Puerto Rico
(2×)
See Esteban v. Central Missouri State College, 290 F.Supp. 622 (D.C.Mo.1968) aff’d 415 F.2d 1077 (8 Cir. 1969) (Blackmun, J.) cert. den. 398 U.S. 965 , 90 S.Ct. 2169 , 26 L.Ed.2d 548 (1970); Siegel v. Regents of University of California, D.C., 308 F.Supp. 832 , etc. The rationale behind most of the cases refusing to apply a vagueness test to University regulations was predicated upon several principles.
examined
Cited "see"
Gary A. Soucie v. Edward E. David, Jr., Director, Office of Science and Technology
(4×)
V, 1970); see Epstein v. Resor, 421 F.2d 930, 932 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 965 , 90 S.Ct. 2176 , 26 L.Ed.2d 549 (1970) 39 One statement in the report of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary specifically supports the conclusion that Congress intended to eliminate equitable discretion.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Mortgage Corp. v. Mathern (In Re Mathern)
(2×)
See also Esteban v. Central Mo. State College, 415 F.2d 1077 , 1085 (8th Cir.1969), cert. den., 398 U.S. 965 , 90 S.Ct. 2169 , 26 L.Ed.2d 548 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jaksa v. Regents of University of Michigan
(2×)
Compare Givens v. Poe, 346 F.Supp. 202 (W.D.N.C.1972) (Due process clause requires representation by counsel at suspension hearings.) and Esteban v. Central Missouri State College, 277 F.Supp. 649 (W.D.Mo.1967), affd. 415 F.2d 1077 (8th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 965 , 90 S.Ct. 2169 , 26 L.Ed.2d 548 (1970) (Due process clause requires representation by counsel at a suspension hearing.) with Madera v. Board of Education, 386 F.2d 778 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1028 , 88 S.Ct. 1416 , 20 L.Ed.2d 284 (1968) (No right to counsel at a conference relating to the suspension of a stud…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Gerard J. Cantwell, Debtor. Appeal of Continental Bank and Beatrice Pitt and Samuel Pitt
(2×)
See, e. g., Samoff v. International Assoc. of Machinists District Lodge No. 1, 420 F.2d 952 (3d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 965 , 90 S.Ct. 2171 , 26 L.Ed.2d 548 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Exner v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
See also Epstein v. Resor, 421 F.2d 930, 933 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 398 U.S. 965 , 90 S.Ct. 2176 , 26 L.Ed.2d 549 (1970). . § 552a(g)(3)(A) provides, in pertinent part: In any suit brought under the [access] provisions of subsection (g)(1)(B) of this section, the court may enjoin the agency from withholding the records and order the production to the complainant of any agency records improperly withheld from him.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1980
See also Epstein v. Resor, 421 F.2d 930, 933 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied 398 U.S. 965 , 90 S.Ct. 2176 , 26 L.Ed.2d 549 (1970) 2 § 552a(g)(3)(A) provides, in pertinent part: In any suit brought under the (access) provisions of subsection (g)(1)(B) of this section, the court may enjoin the agency from withholding the records and order the production to the complainant of any agency records improperly withheld from him.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. JOINT BARGAINING COMMITTEE, ETC.
See also, Samoff v. Int'l Ass'n of Machinists District Lodge No. 1, 420 F.2d 952 (3d Cir. 1969), cert. denied 398 U.S. 965 , 90 S.Ct. 2171 , 26 L.Ed.2d 548 (1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Joint Bargaining Committee for Pennsylvania Social Services Union
See also, Samoff v. Int’l Ass’n of Machinists District Lodge No. 1, 420 F.2d 952 (3d Cir. 1969), cert. denied 398 U.S. 965 , 90 S.Ct. 2171 , 26 L.Ed.2d 548 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marin v. University of Puerto Rico
(2×)
Compare Esteban v. Central Missouri State College (D.C.Mo.1968), 290 F.Supp. 622 , affd. (8 Cir. 1969), 415 F.2d 1077 , cert. den. 398 U.S. 965 , 90 S.Ct. 2169 , 26 L.Ed.2d 548 (1970), and Papish v. Board of Curators of University of Missouri (D.C.Miss.1971), 331 F.Supp. 1321 , affd. (8 Cir. 1972), 464 F.2d 136 , with Soglin v. Kauffman (D.C.Wis. 1968), 295 F.Supp. 978 , affd. (7 Cir. 1969), 418 F.2d 163 ; Sword v. Fox (D.C.Va.1970), 317 F.Supp. 1055, 1062 , rev. on other grounds (4 Cir. 1971), 446 F.2d 1091, 1099 , cert. den. 404 U.S. 994 , 92 S.Ct. 534 , 30 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patsy T. Mink v. Environmental Protection Agency, William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
Compare Epstein v. Resor, 421 F.2d 930, 933 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 965 , 90 S.Ct. 2176 , 26 L.Ed.2d 549 (1970), Sen.Rep. 813, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. (1965) at 8, vnth H.R.Rep. 1497, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. (1966) at 9-10, Dept, of Justice, Attorney General’s Memorandum on the Public Information Section of the A.P.A. (1967) at 30. 5 . 5.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Scranton School District v. Scranton Federation of Teachers
See also, Samoff v. Int’l Ass’n of Machinists District Lodge No. 1, 420 F. 2d 952 (3d Cir. 1969), cert denied 398 U.S. 965 (1970).
Esteban
v.
Central Missouri State College
v.
Central Missouri State College
No. 1026.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 15, 1970.
Consideration, Douglas, Granted, Should, Took.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.