green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
FMC Corp. v. Boesky
See Baumel v. Rosen, 283 F.Supp. 128 , 144 n. 8 (D.Maryland 1968), aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 412 F.2d 571 (3d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1037 , 90 S.Ct. 681 , 688, 24 L.Ed.2d 681 (1970); Weinstein & Berger, 1 Weinstein's Evidence, ¶201[06], at 201-47 (1988); Fed.R.Evid. 201(f). 18 .
discussed
Cited "see"
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. James E. MacDONALD, Jr., Defendant, Appellant
(2×)
See Baumel v. Rosen, 4 Cir., 1969, 412 F.2d 571, 576 , cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1037 , 90 S.Ct. 681 , 24 L.Ed.2d 681 ; cf. Mitchell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 10th Cir., 1971, 446 F.2d 90, 105 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 564 , 30 L.Ed.2d 558 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard W. Bosse v. Crowell Collier and MacMillan
(2×)
See Baumel v. Rosen, 412 F.2d 571, 574-75 (4th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1037 , 90 S.Ct. 681 , 24 L.Ed.2d 681 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American General Insurance v. Equitable General Corp.
Compare Baumel v. Rosen, 283 F.Supp. 128, 144-48 (D.Md.1968), aff’d as to liability, rev’d as to issue of rescission, 412 F.2d 571 (4th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1037 , 90 S.Ct. 681 , 24 L.Ed.2d 681 (1970) (requirements for rescission consisting of the presence of equitable jurisdiction, the absence of plaintiff’s laches, the absence of a change in position and the absence of accretions in value of the subject property not due to the fraud complained of; trial court reversed on rescissional analysis due to plaintiffs’ untimeliness in demanding rescission), with Myzel v. Fields…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington Mobilization Committee v. Burtell M. Jefferson, Chief of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia
See, e. g., Benn v. Sankin, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 361 , 362, 410 F.2d 1060, 1061 (D.C.Cir.1969) (per curiam), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1041 , 90 S.Ct. 681 , 24 L.Ed.2d 685 (1970); Von der Heydt v. Kennedy, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 78 , 82, 299 F.2d 459, 463 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 916 , 82 S.Ct. 1554 , 8 L.Ed.2d 498 (1962). “[I]t is most exceptional for an appellate court to interfere with the discretion exercised by the trial court in determining this issue . . .” Harris v. Whiteman, 243 F.2d 563, 565 (5th Cir. 1957), rev’d per curiam on other grounds sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fox v. Kane-Miller Corp.
Compare Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 422 F.2d 1124, 1129 (4th Cir. 1970), with Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 488 F.2d 912, 914-15 (4th Cir. 1973), and Baumel v. Rosen, 283 F.Supp. 128, 140 (D.Md. 1968) (Winter, J., sitting by designation as a district judge), aff’d in part and rev’d in part on other grounds, 412 F.2d 571 (4th Cir. 1969) (seemingly aff’d, at 573, as to the point of this citation), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1037 , 90 S.Ct. 681 , 24 L.Ed.2d 681 (1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Benn
v.
Sankin
v.
Sankin
No. 772.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 19, 1970.
396 U.S. 1041
Sherman L. Cohn for petitioner.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.