Aikens v. California, 403 U.S. 952 (1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Aikens v. California, 403 U.S. 952 (1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Phelan v. Joseph R. Brierley, Warden, State Correctional Institution, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (ca3, 1971-10-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Phelan v. Joseph R. Brierley, Warden, State Correctional Institution, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Aikens v. California, 403 U.S. 952 , 91 S.Ct. 2280 , 29 L.Ed.2d 863 , Furman v. Georgia, 403 U.S. 952 , 91 S.Ct. 2282 , 29 L.Ed.2d 863 , Jackson v. Georgia, 403 U.S. 952 , 91 S. Ct. 2287 , 29 L.Ed.2d 863 , Branch v. Texas, 403 U.S. 952 , 91 S.Ct. 2287 , 29 L.Ed.2d 864 (1971).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Roy B. Scrivner v. Robert J. Tansy, Warden, New Mexico State Penitentiary Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
10th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cf. Jackson v. Ylst, 921 F.2d 882, 885 (9th Cir.1990) (to prevail on federal habeas, petitioner must demonstrate violation of his constitutional or other federal right). 21 A trial court's failure to afford a defendant the right of allocution raises neither a jurisdictional nor a constitutional error cognizable in habeas. 5 Hill v. United States, 368 U.S. 424, 428 , 82 S.Ct. 468, 471 , 7 L.Ed.2d 417 (1962); see also Segura v. Patterson, 402 F.2d 249, 252-53 (10th Cir.1968), rev'd on other grounds, 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2280 , 29 L.Ed.2d 856 (1971).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Scrivner v. Tansy
10th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
A trial court’s failure to afford a defendant the right of allocution raises neither a jurisdictional nor a constitutional error cognizable in habeas. 5 Hill v. United States, 368 U.S. 424, 428 , 82 S.Ct. 468, 471 , 7 L.Ed.2d 417 (1962); see also Segura v. Patterson, 402 F.2d 249, 252-53 (10th Cir.1968), rev’d on other grounds, 403 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 2280 , 29 L.Ed.2d 856 (1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Aikens
v.
California
No. 5049.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 1971.
403 U.S. 952
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Sup. Ct. Cal.. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Does the imposition ^and carrying out of the death penalty in this case constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and'Fourteenth Amendments?”