green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.6 score
“turner; of course, did not set down a rigid, per se rule automatically requiring the reversal of any conviction whenever any government witness comes into any contact with the jury.”
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Willie Leon Scott v. Warden Grant Culliver
turner; of course, did not set down a rigid, per se rule automatically requiring the reversal of any conviction whenever any government witness comes into any contact with the jury.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
McNair v. Campbell
The intensity and extent of the contact between a witness and jurors are two factors to be considered by the court in such a claim., Id. at 1056 , 92 S.Ct. at 1505.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Kelley
Id. 405 U.S. at 1054-55, 92 S.Ct. at 1504-05, 31 L.Ed.2d at 788-89 (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ex Parte McNair
"When a key witness against a defendant doubles as the officer of the court specifically charged with the care and protection of the jurors, associating with them on both a personal and an official basis while simultaneously testifying for the prosecution, the adversary system of justice is perverted." Gonzales, supra, at 1055-56 , 92 S.Ct. at 1505-06.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Larry Joe Johnson v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
(2×)
Id. at 1054-55, 92 S.Ct. at 1504. 39 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hawkins v. Estelle
(2×)
It is enough to bring the petitioner’s case within the four corners of Turner that the key witness for the prosecution also served as the guardian of the jury, associating extensively with the jurors during the trial.” 405 U.S. at 1056, 92 S.Ct. at 1505, 31 L.Ed.2d at 789.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Stephenson v. State
Turner established the simple principle that association of that particular sort cannot be permitted if criminal defendants are to be afforded due process of law.” 92 S. Ct. at 1505.
cited
Cited "see"
Tong Xiong v. Tom Felker
See Caliendo, 365 F.3d at 696 (citing Gonzales v. Beto, 405 U.S. 1052 , 92 S.Ct. 1503 , 31 L.Ed.2d 787 (1972) (memorandum dissent and concurrence)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bass v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Conaway v. State, 277 Ga. 422, 424 (2), 589 S.E.2d 108 (2003). [5] (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Worthy v. State, 286 Ga.App. 77, 79 (2), 648 S.E.2d 682 (2007). [6] (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Smith v. State, 282 Ga.App. 339, 345 (4), 638 S.E.2d 791 (2006). [7] Lajara v. State, 263 Ga. 438, 440 (3), 435 S.E.2d 600 (1993). [8] Suggs v. State, 272 Ga. 85, 88 (4), 526 S.E.2d 347 (2000). [9] 379 U.S. 466 , 85 S.Ct. 546 , 13 L.Ed.2d 424 (1965). [10] 263 Ga. 47 , 426 S.E.2d 868 (1993). [11] 268 Ga. 286 , 486 S.E.2d 887 (1997). [12] (Punctuation omitted.) Radford, supra at 48 (1),…
discussed
Cited "see"
Pierce v. State
See, Gonzales v. Beto, 405 U.S. 1052, 1055 , 92 S.Ct. 1503 , 31 L.Ed.2d 787 (1972) (recognizing that Turner "did not set down a rigid per se rule automatically requiring the reversal of any conviction whenever any Government witness comes into any contact with the jury"). [5] However, the majority cites *605 Holloway v. State, 477 So.2d 487 (Ala.Cr.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lawrence Delisle v. Jessie Rivers, Warden
(2×)
See Gonzales v. Beto, 405 U.S. 1052 , 92 S.Ct. 1503 , 31 L.Ed.2d 787 (1972); Leonard v. United States, 378 U.S. 544 , 84 S.Ct. 1696 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1964); Leviton v. United States, 343 U.S. 946 , 72 S.Ct. 860 , 96 L.Ed. 1350 (1952) (Frankfurter, J.); United States v. Noriega, 917 F.2d 1543 (11th Cir.1990); In re Application of Dow Jones & Co., Inc., 842 F.2d 603 (2d Cir.1988); Holmes v. United States, 284 F.2d 716 (4th Cir.1960); Krogmann v. United States, 225 F.2d 220 (6th Cir.1955); Briggs v. United States, 221 F.2d 636 (6th Cir.1955); Delaney v. United States, 199 F.2d 107 (1st Cir.1952)…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph
Johnson v. Wainwright, 778 F.2d 623, 626 (11th Cir. 1985); see Gonzales, 405 U.S. at 1054-6 , 92 S. Ct. at 1504-5.
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry J. Johnson v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent
(2×)
See Gonzales, 405 U.S. at 1056 , 92 S.Ct. at 1505 (Stewart, J., joined by Marshall & Douglas, JJ., concurring in the judgment).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Raynard Cummings v. Michael Martel
(4×)
In Turner , the deputies drove jurors to restaurants for each meal and to their lodgings each night, did errands for them, and “freely mingled and conversed with the jurors”— allowing the deputies to “renew old friendships and make new acquaintances among the members of the jury.” 379 U.S. at 468, 473 , 85 S.Ct. 546 ; see also Beto, 405 U.S. at 1053, 92 S.Ct. 1503 (sheriff walked jurors to lunch, ate with them in a private room, and brought them soft drinks in the jury room); Tong Xiong v. Felker, 681 F.3d 1067, 1077 (9th Cir.2012) (emphasizing the “continuous” and “intimate”…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Majors v. State
See also, Gonzales v. Beto, 405 U.S. 1052 , 92 S.Ct. 1503 , 31 L.Ed.2d 787 (1972) (reversing the defendant's conviction because a county sheriff, who was the prosecution's key witness, served as bailiff). [¶13] In Romo, 500 P.2d at 680-82 , we reversed the defendant's conviction on a see-ond degree murder charge because three jurors had lunch with two police officers, one of whom was a principal witness in the case.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Thurmer
(2×)
Turner, 379 U.S. at 473 , 85 S.Ct. 546 ; see also Gonzales, 405 U.S. at 1056 , 92 S.Ct. 1503 (observing that the bailiffs “extended” association with the jurors was more than de minimis).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bass v. State
See also Gonzales v. Beto, 405 U.S. 1052, 1054 , 92 S.Ct. 1503 , 31 L.Ed.2d 787 (1972) (Stewart, J., concurring); Radford v. State, 263 Ga. 47, 48 (1), 426 S.E.2d 868 (1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Earl Bobby Betner
Compare Gonzales v. Beto, 1972, 405 U.S. 1052, 1054 , 92 S.Ct. 1503 , 31 L.Ed.2d 787 , Justice Stewart concurring.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Weddel
v.
Craven, Warden
v.
Craven, Warden
No. 71-5516.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 17, 1972.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)
Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.