green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"(O)nce jurisdiction has attached, powers under § 1651(a) should be broadly construed."
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[Ojnce jurisdiction has attached, powers under § 1651(a) should be broadly construed.”
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Application of the United States of America in the Matter of an Order Authorizing the Use of a Pen Register or Similar Mechanical Device
(2×)
(o)nce jurisdiction has attached, powers under 1651(a) should be broadly construed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kish v. Verniero (In Re Kish)
See Nix v. Fulton Lodge No. 2 of Int’l Ass'n of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, 452 F.2d 794, 797-98 (5th Cir.1971) ("By no stretch of the imagination can the Xerox copies of opinions of this court, attached to a memorandum of law submitted by the Grand Lodge in connection with the Rule 12(b)(6) motion be said to constitute matters outside the pleadings sufficient to transform a Rule 12(b)(6) motion into a motion for summary judgment.”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 946 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972); cf. J/H Real Estate Inc. v. Abramson, 901 F.Supp. 952 , 955 & n. …
discussed
Cited "see"
Caroline C. v. Johnson
See Nix v. Fulton Lodge No. 2 of the Int’l Ass’n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, 452 F.2d 794 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 946 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972) (district court properly limited a class to avoid justiciability problems).
cited
Cited "see"
Grand Traverse Band v. Director, Michigan Department of Natural Resources
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 158 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Real Property & Premises Known as 63-39 Trimble Road
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 157 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972); cf. United States v. One (1) Douglas A-26B Aircraft, 662 F.2d 1372, 1373-74 (11th Cir.1981) (writ of assistance pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 70 is “designed ‘to deal with parties who seek to thwart judgments by refusals to comply with orders to perform specific acts[.]’ ”) (quoting 12 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bedoni v. Navajo-Hopi Indian Relocation Commission
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152 (9th Cir.1971), ce rt. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972); Hamilton v. MacDonald, 503 F.2d 1138 (9th Cir.1974); Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald, 544 F.2d 396 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977). .The Navajo disputed the boundaries of the partition order.
cited
Cited "see"
Hedgepeth v. Fruehauf Corp.
See Noonan v. Midland Capital Corp., 453 F.2d 459 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 333 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blackburn Truck Lines, Inc. v. Raymond J. Francis, an Individual Maria Francis, an Individual Crisp International, Inc., a Georgia Corporation
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 157 (9th Cir.) (“The equitable jurisdiction of a federal court extends to supplemental or ancillary bills brought for the purpose of effectuating a decree of the same court.”), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wichita Board Of Trade v. United States
See Greater Boston Television Corporation v. F.C.C., D.C.Cir., 463 F.2d 268 , 287, cert. denied, 406 U.S. 943 , 92 S.Ct. 2042 , 32 L.Ed.2d 339 , and Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. U.S., D.Del., 446 F.Supp. 721 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Wichita Board of Trade v. United States
See Greater Boston Television Corporation v. F.C.C., D.C.Cir., 463 F.2d 268 , 287, cert. denied, 406 U.S. 943 , 92 S.Ct. 2042 , 32 L.Ed.2d 339 , and Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. U.S., D.Del., 446 F.Supp. 721 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 155-58 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 155-58 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernay v. Sales
(2×)
See Nix v. Fulton Lodge No. 2, International Association of Machinists, 452 F.2d 794, 798 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 946 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Exxon Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company
See Nix v. Fulton Lodge No. 2, 5 Cir. 1971, 452 F.2d 794 , 797-98, cert. denied, 1972, 406 U.S. 946 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 ; 5 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶41.02[3] at 41-32 (2d ed. 1978); 9 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Ramos Algarin
(2×)
Id.; see Lovasco, supra, 431 U.S. at 793 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 ; United States v. Daley, 454 F.2d 505, 508 (1st Cir. 1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 157 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
William Bond, Etc. v. Alton White, Etc., United States of America v. Twiggs County Georgia, Etc.
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 ; W.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stokes v. Children's Hospital, Inc.
See also Noonan v. Midland Capital Corp., 453 F.2d 459, 462 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 333 (1972) (ruling for defendant as a matter of law after the jury twice reported itself deadlocked); Gonzalez v. Avon Prods., Inc., 648 F.Supp. 1404, 1407 (D.Del.1986), aff'd, 822 F.2d 53 (3d Cir.1987) (ruling that jury’s failure to reach a verdict in this case did not bar defendant’s motion); Street v. Hedgepath, 607 A.2d 1238, 1244 (D.C.App.1992) (holding that express language of Rule 50 gave trial court jurisdiction to grant motion after mistrial declared).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wards Co. v. Jonnet Development Corp.
See also Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152 (9th Cir.1971) (district court has ancillary jurisdiction over petition for writ of assistance to enforce its earlier order declaring rights in land), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp.
See also Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152 (9th Cir.1971) (district court has ancillary jurisdiction over petition for writ of assistance to enforce its earlier order declaring rights in land), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arturo Perez
See also Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 155 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972); United States v. Clearfield State Bank, 497 F.2d 356, 358-59 (10th Cir.1974); Peake v. First National Bank and Trust Company of Marquette, 717 F.2d 1016, 1019-20 (6th Cir.1983). 3 It is entirely plain that the January 1984 order of the district court was, and was intended to be, the final dispositive and adjudicatory action of the district court, rather than an opinion or findings.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. United Transportation Union
McElearney v. University of Illinois, 612 F.2d 285 , 290 n. 3 (7th Cir.1979); see also Nix v. Fulton Lodge No. 2, International Association of Machinists, 452 F.2d 794, 797 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 946 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972); accord, 5 C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
ca7 1982
See also Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 156 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McKee-Berger-Mansueto, Inc. v. Board of Education
See also Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 156 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Maier v. Patterson
See, e. g., Fulton Lodge No. 2, IAM v. Nix, 415 F.2d 212 , 217 & nn. 12-13 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 946 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mader v. Crowell
See, e. g., Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972) (purpose of three-judge court is fulfilled when its judgment is entered, and single judge may act to enforce judgment); Allen v. County School Board of Prince Edward County, 249 F.2d 462 (4th Cir. 1957) (single judge may fix time for complying with three-judge desegregation order); and Pabst v. Campbell, 150 F.Supp. 71 (S.D.Ind. 1957) (following judgment of three-judge court, single judge may assess damages and costs against plaintiffs and their injunction bond suretie…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Edward A. Winter v. Local Union No. 639, Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and Maloney Concrete Company (Two Cases)
See, e. g., Fulton Lodge No. 2, IAM v. Nix, 415 F.2d 212, 216 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 946 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972) (exhaustion futile where remedy was personal appeal to officers with whom expelled member had “continuing difficulties”); Farowitz v. Musicians Local 802, 330 F.2d 999, 1003 (2d Cir. 1964) (exhaustion futile where appellate board had consistently opposed worker’s position and had asserted its position in litigation for four years); Calagaz v. Calhoon, 309 F.2d 248, 260 (5th Cir. 1962) (exhaustion futile where appeal would be to officers against…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sipe v. Local Union No. 191 United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners
Compare Fulton Lodge No. 2 of International Association of Machinists v. Nix, 5 Cir. 1969, 415 F.2d 212 , 220 n. 23, aff’g in part, N.D.Ga. 1967, 262 F.Supp. 1000 , cert. denied 1972, 406 U.S. 946 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 , with Int’l Bhd. of Boilermakers v. Braswell, supra. Here the complaint charges that the action taken was intended to interfere with Title I rights “pursuant to a conspiracy to violate plaintiff’s rights.” Therefore, we cannot say at this juncture that plaintiff will be unable to prove the requisite malice.
Kahn et ux.
v.
Arizona State Tax Commission
v.
Arizona State Tax Commission
No. 71-1263.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 22, 1972.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2)
Appeal from Ct. App. Ariz. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.