green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.8 score
“the hearsay rule has no application where the question is whether certain things were said or written by a third person and not whether they are true.”
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Reading Nursing Center v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
the hearsay rule has no application where the question is whether certain things were said or written by a third person and not whether they are true.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Willet Metzger
See United States v. Morningstar, 456 F.2d 278 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 896 , 93 S.Ct. 135 , 34 L.Ed.2d 153 (1972), cited in United States v. Greer, 588 F.2d 1151, 1156 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 983 , 99 S.Ct. 1794 , 60 L.Ed.2d 244 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillip R. Balano
(2×)
See United States v. Archer, 455 F.2d 193, 194 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 856 , 93 S.Ct. 135 , 34 L.Ed.2d 100 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Wayne Schwanke, Virgil Ernest Huggins, Olen Collins
See United States v. Archer, 455 F.2d 193 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 856 , 93 S.Ct. 135 , 34 L.Ed.2d 100 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Townsend
See, e. g., United States v. Morningstar, 456 F.2d 278 (4th Cir.) cert. denied, 409 U.S. 896 , 93 S.Ct. 135 , 34 L.Ed.2d 153 (1972); United States v. Oba, 448 F.2d 892 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 935 , 92 S.Ct. 979 , 30 L.Ed.2d 811 (1972); Langel v. United States, 451 F.2d 957 (8th Cir. 1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salvatore Cirami and James Cirami
See, e. g., United States v. Archer, 455 F.2d 193 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 856 , 93 S.Ct. 135 , 34 L.Ed.2d 100 (1972); United States v. Colasurdo, supra. Despite this modern line of cases, uncertainty has persisted as to the propriety of withdrawing indictment language from a trial jury’s consideration because Bain , which “has never been disapproved,” Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212, 217 , 80 S.Ct. 270 , 4 L.Ed.2d 252 (1960), itself involved the withdrawal from the jury’s consideration of language not essential to the offense charged.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jacobs
v.
Pennsylvania
v.
Pennsylvania
No. 71-6523.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
Published
Citer courts: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylv… (1)
Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.