green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Burton v. Hobbie
(2×)
See Sims v. Amos, 336 F.Supp. 924 (M.D.Ala.), affirmed, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Apportionment Law, Etc.
See Sims v. Amos, 336 F. Supp. 924 (M.D.Ala.) (although recognizing its power to order mid-term elections as plan unconstitutional, court refrains from so doing at its discretion), aff'd, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972). [6] Reliance on Swann v. Adams by the majority is particularly inappropriate since that case did not interpret the provision now before us. [7] Colo.Const., art.
cited
Cited "see"
Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer
See Sims v. Amos, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1973), aff’g, 340 F.Supp. 693 (M.D.Ala.1972) (three-judge court); Souza v. Travisono, 512 F.2d 1137, 1139 (1st Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
10 Fair empl.prac.cas. 956, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,270 Garland M. Fitzpatrick, Donald Matthews and Mortimer Covert v. Frederick Bitzer, Chairman of the State Employees' Retirement Commission, Etal.
See Sims v. Amos, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1973), aff'g, 340 F.Supp. 693 (M.D.Ala. 1972) (three-judge court); Souza v. Travisono, 512 F.2d 1137, 1139 (1st Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Incarcerated Man of Allen County Jail v. Edward Fair, Sheriff of Allen County
See Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691, 694 (M.D.Ala.), aff’d, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hallmark Clinic v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources
(2×)
Such an award of fees has in fact been summarily affirmed by the Supreme Court in the only case that seems to have reached that court; see Amos v. Sims, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972), affirming 336 F.Supp. 924 and 340 F.Supp. 691 (M.D.Ala.1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fairley v. Patterson
See Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691, 694 (M.D.Ala.) (three-judge court), aff'd. per curiam, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972); Dyer v. Love, 307 F.Supp. 974 (N.D.Miss.1969). 35 The second supporting rationale, the private attorney general theory, is derived from the Supreme Court opinions in Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc., supra; and Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co., supra, 396 U.S. at 389-397.
cited
Cited "see"
Fairley v. Patterson
See Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691, 694 (M.D.Ala.) (three-judge court), aff’d. per curiam, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972); Dyer v. Love, 307 F.Supp. 974 (N.D.Miss.1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Ass'n v. Civiletti
See, e.g., Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691 (M.D.Ala.) (three-judge court), aff'd, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972); Stanford Daily v. Zurcher, 366 F.Supp. 18 (N.D.Cal. 1973), aff'd, 550 F.2d 464 (9th Cir. 1977), rev’d on other grounds, 436 U.S. 547 , 98 S.Ct. 1970 , 56 L.Ed.2d 525 (1978). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zarcone v. Perry
See e.g., Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691 (M.D.Ala.1972), aff’d, 93 S.Ct. 290 , 409 U.S. 942 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972); Sanford Daily v. Zurcher, 366 F.Supp. 18 (N.D.Cal.1973); and cases cited in Alyeska Pipeline, supra, at n. 46.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vijay v. Satoskar, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Indiana Real Estate Commission
Compare Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691 , 693—694 (M.D.Ala.1972), aff’d, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972), with Donahue v. Staunton, 471 F.2d 475, 482-483 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 955 , 93 S.Ct. 1419 , 35 L.Ed.2d 687 (1973), and see discussion of the two in Alyeska Pipeline, 421 U.S. at 270 n. 46, 95 S.Ct. at 1628 n. 46, 44 L.Ed.2d 141 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anthony Souza v. Anthony P. Travisono
Compare, e. g., Skehan v. Board of Trustees, 501 F.2d 31 (3d Cir. 1974), and Jordan v. Gilligan, 500 F.2d 701 (6th Cir. 1974), with Class v. Norton, 505 F.2d 123 (2d Cir. 1974), Gates v. Collier, 489 F.2d 298 -(5th Cir. 1973), petition for rehearing en banc granted, 500 F.2d 1382 (5th Cir. 1974), and Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691 (M.D.Ala.1972), aff’d mem., 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Elena Class v. Nicholas Norton
See also, Sims v. Amos, 340 F.Supp. 691 (M.D.Ala.) (three-judge court), aff’d mem. 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J. B. Taylor v. E. P. Perini, Superintendent
See, e.g., Orleans Parish School Board v. Bush, 242 F.2d 156 (5th Cir. 1957) and the many school cases subsequently decided by this court. 80 'In Sims v. Amos, 336 F.Supp. 924 , 340 F.Supp. 691 (M.D.Ala. 1972), aff'd., 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 215 (1972), the District Court for the Middle District of Alabama dealt with the award of attorney's fees and expenses incurred in a suit against the Governor, state legislators, the attorney general and the secretary of state of Alabama.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Milburn v. Huecker
See also Amos v. Sims, 409 U.S. 942 , 93 S.Ct. 290 , 34 L.Ed.2d 214 , aff’g, 336 F.Supp. 924 , 340 F.Supp. 691 (M.D.Ala. 1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Amos, Secretary of State of Alabama
v.
Sims
v.
Sims
No. 72-12.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 24, 1972.
Cited by 34 opinions | Published
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. M. D. Ala.